IN A TIME OF UNIVERSAL DECEIT...TELLING THE TRUTH BECOMES A REVOLUTIONARY ACT

"Capitalism is the astounding belief that the most wicked of men will do the most wicked of things for the greatest good of everyone." John Maynard Keynes

" Labor is prior to, and independent of, capital; that, in fact, capital is the fruit of labor, and could never have existed if labor had not first existed. Labor is the superior of capital and deserves much the higher consideration" Abraham Lincoln

Wednesday, November 9, 2011

MALASPINA ENCOUNTER

Greetings all, forgive us for the delay in writing about my trip to the Malaspina Glacier last month, where your lead editor met with our friends in Ground-Truth Trekking, and joined them in their "Life on Ice" expedition for eight days. http://www.groundtruthtrekking.org/Journeys/LifeOnIce.html

Hig and Erin invited me last summer for part of this trip, in which they hope to document climate change in action, on the largest "Piedmont" glacier in Alaska, spreading out as it does on the coastal plain from it's sources in the high St. Elias mountains inland. I was honoured to accept, since they are such knowledgeable and experienced wilderness-experts and scientists. So after a few months of planning, and then two weeks of feverish preparation, during which I was working in my other position as an operational meteorologist, I left Mattie to hold down the fort at the Chugach Front Research Centre, and boarded Alaska Airlines, to head to Yakutat, on the morning of 21 October. The jumping-off point for the charter flight with Alsek Air, a local outfit in Yakutat, whose pilot Les Hartley was to take me to our meeting site with Hig and Erin, on the beach at "Alder Stream", a wider less-rocky area that at low tide, afforded enough room for Les's Cessna 185 4-seat plane on tundra tires to land and take off safely from the beach.

Hig and Erin's friend Sam Vivang also accompanied me, he is their web-designer, for the Ground Truth Site, and lives in Madison, WI. A town we admire, being as it is, one of the ultimate, and largest, progressive college towns in the country.
Sam and I met in the Juneau airport, and I re-lived to him all my good memories of living there, Juneau is a beautiful place, and culturally, very diverse and interesting. But the often wretched weather and lack of consistent winter snow, led me to move on from there in 2001. I still miss it though.

We made it to Yakutat at 1130, and were immediately met by Alsek Air, and loaded up on Les's Cessna 185. It's a small 4-6 seat plane that can take off and land in very short order, needing only 200 metres or so of a suitable stretch. Sam and I, and our gear were loaded in, and we quickly took off by 1230, and headed to the Alder Stream landing site.
Yakutat, here from the air as we departed, started as a Tlingit village, and is now home to a mixed population, making their living mainly from fishing, tourism, and some government jobs. It has the distinction of being one of the wetter sites in Alaska, receiving 343 cm of precipitation annually. On this day, we actually had dry weather, rare for October, as fall is the wettest season along the Gulf of Alaska.
We only flew at around 300 metres altitude, just very high clouds were present, and winds were relatively light, underneath high pressure ridging, which promised to hold for a few more days. Looking to the north, the huge mass of Hubbard Glacier came into view, up Yakutat Bay, whose source lies far inland in Kluane National Park in Canada, part of which is 5959 metre (19,850 ft) Mt. Logan, the second highest peak in North America.

After just a short 30 min., 55 km flight, we landed on the beach at the Alder Stream site, and quickly unloaded. Our plane to Yakutat from Juneau had been late, and so we arrived at the beach late, as the tide was quickly rising. This left Les with just a few minutes to be on the beach, before having to take off again. We rapidly shuttled our gear and supplies up onto the higher ground behind the beach, and then met with Hig, Erin, and their friend Carl Donohue, a professional wilderness guide and photographer, who had already been with them a week, and would be for at least another.
Here, Sam, on the left, Hig (in the blue vest), and Erin are inspecting the supplies while 2 year old Katmai, and 9 month old baby Lituya relax on the beach. My 34 kg (75lb) pack, in the blue, was awaiting me, which I was not looking forward to. But I had to have my Alpacka pack raft/paddle (3kg), in addition to my best weatherproof tent, clothing, and 9 days of food/fuel, so that was the best I could do.

It was just a short 6.5 km jaunt up to our first camp, where we spent two nights, west up the coastline. Walking along the beach, punctuated by two stream crossings, which Hig ferried us all across with our supplies individually in his larger two-person packraft. This was faster than all of us individually inflating/deflating our rafts, etc...

The ocean here is very powerful and turbulent, as you would expect, being the northern margin of the Gulf of Alaska, where low pressure systems are almost always present. Even though on this day, Friday the 21st of October, winds were light, underneath high pressure ridging, swells coming off the Gulf still produced powerful surf with 1.5-2 metre or more high waves, that break close in to shore, due to the steeply dropping land margin. In fact, we really needed to be on our guard, so we wouldn't get too close to any of these "shore breaks", and get swept off our feet, and into the icy cold 4C (39F) water.
We arrived to our first camp site set about 200 metres back from the beach in a Sitka Spruce forest, around 1730. After quickly setting up camp, we all had dinner, then hung out and made plans for the following few days. We decided to stay there the next day, Saturday, so all of us could get to know each other better, and see that site better. Just another 100 metres or so behind our forest camp, the Sitka Spruce were all dead standing, some kind of flood had killed them in the past few years. Behind that, one of the many streams coming off the Malaspina glacier flowed east-west. After a relaxing night (though the sound of the booming, crashing surf was very loud, even 200 metres in), the next day, Saturday, dawned dry with some sun. After a lazy breakfast, we all decided to go hiking inland, behind camp, and then around to the beach, further west, then back, to camp.

Heading just inland from camp, we quickly came into the dead spruce area. Some of these were very large and had been old, at least 100 years or more, judging by their 30-40 metre heights.

Hig thinks that multiple flooding episodes led to the demise of this area of trees, which seemed to extend several km up and down along the adjacent stream, which overran it's banks. We surmised warm, high-freezing-level storms in late summer or fall, which would have melted snows and glacier ice on the higher grounds inland, would have been the mechanism to raise the waterways so high here (and which are occurring more frequently now, especially in the last 10 years). From the looks of these standing dead trees, it was no more than five years ago, that this happened.
Heading further inland, toward the banks of the river/stream, we began to get vistas of the high St.Elias mountains, that are the source region for the Malaspina, and other glaciers around. 
These 3000-4500 metre peaks are fully encased in permanent snow and glacier ice, and form about a 200 km long NW-SE oriented wall just 15-40 km inland from the Gulf of Alaska. The amount of precipitation that these mountains receive annually is hard to even fathom, easily two to three times the 343 cm that Yakutat receives, most of it snow, above 2000 metres. We hiked around this area for a few hours, while we all talked about the stunning scenery and made our surmises about the causes of all the flooding disturbances we saw. Since Hig has a PhD in geology, and is very interested in meteorology and climatology, our discussions were very interesting and detailed.

Little two year-old Katmai was having fun just walking around, picking up things, and chattering away, as most two year-olds do. Erin was carrying baby Lituya in a pack behind her back, and she was mostly snoozing in the mild 6C (43F) afternoon. Hig and Erin took alot of precautions and care for their children. They had a large tepee-style tent, which has a wood-stove, the whole setup weighs less than 4 kg packed up. This keeps everyone warm and dry while it's raining, and allows wet clothing/gear to dry out. They had food caches set-up beforehand, and a satellite phone to rely on, in case of any emergencies. So the children were in good hands, and always able to stay warm and dry. And I was too, on the rainiest of my days there, when I would hang out with them, next to that nice little stove!
After a few hours of hiking and beach-combing, as evening began to set in, majestic 5489 metre (18,008 ft) Mt. St. Elias was out in it's full glory. This mountain is rarely climbed, due to  it's treacherous weather and highly dangerous avalanches and icefalls, from the tremendous volumes of snow and ice on it. It is the third highest peak north of Mexico, after Denali, and Mt. Logan just to the north, in Canada.  
The next day, Sunday the 23rd, was still dry and sunny. It was below freezing that morning, about -2C (28F), judging by the crunchy moss, but not a real deep/hard freeze. We packed up camp, and then set off around 1100 for our next base, Sitkagi "lagoon", a feature that did not exist ten years ago.

The first few km we were able to packraft down the stream behind camp, behind which we had our mountain views. This just took an hour or so. Then on the other side of that, about a km of beach walking on sand/pebbles. Then another stream/packraft crossing. On the other side of that, Hig, Erin, and Carl had come across a large dead sea lion a few days before, and we made sure to make lots of noise, staying all together, before venturing up to it. In case any bears were eating from and guarding it. But we saw none, or even any signs of some.

We weren't sure of the cause of this large creature's demise, no bullet holes or large wounds were in evidence, so perhaps it was disease, or some other natural cause. We didn't spend too much time here though, just to be on the safe side. From here, it was about another 5 km or so to the "lagoon". The first 3 km were nice beach-walking, like that seen by the dead sea lion, a mix of sand and small rocks. But after that, the sandy beach turned into boulder fields, requiring hopping across/through all of them.
With our heavy packs on, this slowed us down considerably. I felt quite uneasy as well, with my 34 kg pack on, since I had broken my left knee in 2007 by falling onto a boulder near the Gulkana Glacier, in the Alaska Range, and desperately wished not to repeat that experience.
We finally go to Sitkagi at 1730, by which time we only had another hour of light to set up camp. Hig and Carl set out to try and find a suitable camp spot, but were not able to. So we had to set up in an exposed spot at the foot of the "lagoon" just behind logs and rocks thrown up by the last big storms, which you can see, above. A rather precarious spot, to be sure, but we figured we could always move camp the next day, if need be. I was completely soaked in sweat then, from lugging that heavy pack, but some time that evening in Hig and Erin's warm tent by the fire, helped dry me out.

The next day, Monday the 25th of October, the weather began changing. The day started out cloudy with light rain, but not too windy, just 20-40 kph, out of the east. Hig, Erin, and the kids set out to explore the lagoon entrance, and raft further up the lagoon, which extends about a km inland. Sam and I stayed behind to walk along the beach, and then raft a little later, we were hoping the weather would improve a little. It never did, so I put my raft in around 1300, and paddled up and around the lagoon. It was raining lightly with that 20-40 kph east wind. I didn't get too close to the "lagoon" entrance though, high tide for the day was coming through, and making it rather turbulent there with strong currents and eddies. And I did not want to get caught up in one, and possibly swept back out to sea.
What Sitkagi "Lagoon" is, is an opening in the coastline formed by the melting of the glacier from seawater incursions pushed in by high storm tides. It extends back about 1.5 km from the opening, and is growing constantly, as can be seen by the falls of dirt/trees/shrubs at the base of the glacier. The Malaspina glacier is vegetated on its outer margins here because it had been so slow-moving and stable, until relatively recently, but you can see the ice just underneath. Hig thinks that this lagoon is less than ten years old, and that the at the rate the glacier is melting, combined with ever-higher storm tides pushing into the lagoon from stronger, more frequent storms, that it could end up extending back another 40-50 km within 20 years! That would be a huge change to the topography of this coastline.

That night, Monday night, rain became a little heavier and steady. Then, when we awoke Tuesday, we knew we were going to have a situation on our hands. It should be said, that 5 days previously, during the past week, both the European and American long-range numerical weather prediction models forecast a strong front to come into the area on this day, Tuesday, 10/26, with 60-100 kph winds and several cm of rain. I had texted Hig and Erin to that effect the evening before I flew in. And we had been receiving updates from my NWS colleague Dave, by text messages on Hig and Erin's satellite phone, with that forecast holding.
Above, is the surface map for Tuesday afternoon, the 26 of October. A 968 millibar surface low, with an occluded front, lay just to west of the Malaspina area, in the Northern Gulf of Alaska. This is a fairly strong low any time of the year, in this area. Note how "tightly-packed" the lines, or isobars, of pressure are, there is a very strong pressure gradient with a low that deep, meaning that strong winds will be occurring as it approaches, then passes, with strongest winds just ahead of, and with the front.
Here is the corrresponding infrared satellite image for this time, you can see the centre of the low just off the southern tip of the Kenai Peninsula, when the frontal band was moving through the Malaspina area. When extra-tropical low pressure systems have that distinct "eye" looking centre, it means that they are very deep and strong, and are not to be taken lightly!

The rain had been steady all the previous night, and the winds, moderate, perhaps 30-50 kph (18-30 mph), nothing our tents couldn't handle. There was a brief let-up, even, in the morning, whilst we had breakfast, between 0800-0900. But by 0930, the storm we had been waiting for/worrying about, came in full-on.

At this time, around 0930, the winds came up easily to 70-90 kph sustained (42-55 mph) with gusts easily as high as 120 kph (75 mph). We all, Carl, Sam, Hig, Erin, the kids, and I rotated duties over the next 7 hours, continually monitoring the tents, staking/tying them down more when some of the tie-outs would come loose with the stronger gusts, and checking the log/rock jam above us, to make sure no high seas were breaking over it, which could flood us. High tide that day was around 1400. If you've never spent a day in a storm, in tents, in strong winds, may you never have to! The sound was deafening. I spent much of the day helping Erin continually brace up the inside of their taller tepee-tent, as strong wind gusts were continually trying to bring it down. The kids were surprisingly calm, considering how worried we all were. Some of the most powerful gusts, that could have been 135 kph (80 mph) were like explosions, and it was all we could do to brace it up, inside. We had to keep that woodstove going too, everyone was getting soaked, coming in and out of the howling wind and heavy rain, bracing their tents. Picture-taking was impossible, in these conditions, we didn't even try, we had other things to worry about! At one point, after some particularly strong and worrisome gusts, Erin asked if I could call the NWS on their satellite phone. I called the NWS Anchorage Forecast Office, where I used to work, and my ex-colleague Bill L., told us to expect 2-3 more hours of the strong winds. We were somewhat relieved, as it was around 1300, and were all getting tired, hoping for the best, that all our tents would survive.

Sure enough, right around 1530, the winds suddenly dropped off, almost to calm! The front was passing, and as it did, in a period of just 10 min., a burst of very heavy rain, then hail, and then snow occurred. Once that ended, we all rushed out relieved. During the strong winds, my Mountain Hardwear 3-season tent, with an extra-heavy duty rain fly, would flatten in the strongest gusts. Yet, it held, one of the poles was bent, but it was in good form. And, only a small 15 cm or so diameter little puddle of water was on the tent floor, blown in from the upwind wall. My sleeping bag and pack were dry! That was a relief. We all had a relaxing evening recovering our energy and warming up by the little woodstove, after our dinner.

We briefly checked out the beach. It was still raining/misting overall, it looked like the high tide came just up to the foot of the log/rock barrier, above us, but did not crash or flood through, another thing to be thankful for. I was fairly wet though from my times staking out my tent in the foul weather, bending over and working, the wind drove the rain right up inside my layers. All my other ones were damp from the exertion of the last several days. Hence, I went to bed with damp wool base-layers on, which I was not crazy about. But my -9C (15F) down bag, which was dry, kept me warm enough, and by morning, my body-heat had dried out my base layers.

That was also an interesting night, as when the low itself came through, all night long, heavy showers of rain and hail occurred, along with at least three thunderstorms! I slept very fitfully. When these lows, with very cold air aloft in them, are over warmer ocean waters, the airmass in their centres becomes very unstable, and these scattered, "post-frontal" heavy showers/thundershowers occur.
The next day, Wednesday, dawned cloudy and misty, and after all the heavy showers overnight, little drifts of hail and snow were on the ground, in wind-protected areas. The winds were much lighter overnight however, from the west, less than a third the strength of the strong east to southeast winds ahead of the front the afternoon before.

After breakfast and fire warm-up (it was probably only +1C or so, 34F, cold in that damp breezy weather), we all ventured out to see what changes the storm had wrought, in our local landscape. One very prominent thing, is that during rough weather, foam is generated by the higher seas crashing on the rocky shoreline, which marks the previous high tide level. This was in the late morning on Wednesday. Hig and Erin had studied the tides before coming out, and the highest, high tides of the year, were occurring this very week. In fact, the highest, high tide of the whole year, was to be on this afternoon, around 1530. After walking the beach and up to the lagoon entrance, checking out all the changes, logs thrown about, piles of debris, etc.. we came back to camp by 1400. One other thing we noticed, were large ice chunks from the glacier, which fell into the "lagoon", and then were carried out by the strong tidal surges, the previous day.
 Carl then announced he was moving his tent, and quickly. He was worried we'd all be flooded out by that highest tide, by the lagoon rising. At first, the rest of us were a little dubious, but sure enough, we could see surges of water coming into the lagoon, and the level was rising quickly!
Carl is a wilderness guide with many years of experience, and his knowledge proved invaluable here. We quickly followed suit and rapidly packed up. Here Hig and Erin are packing up their large tent, and you can see water flooding in, right in front of it. We found some suitable dry clear areas in the spruce woods, just in from this picture, and were able to all get in there, just as the entire area we had been in, went under. Where Carl and I had our tents just flooded about 10-20 cm deep, but it was a little deeper where Hig and Erin's large tent had been. These new camp sites were much better than the old exposed ones, sheltered and wind-protected, we would have been much better off there the previous day, had we been in there! That took us the rest of that day, to re-settle camp. During a quick beach excursion though, as the high tide began going out, we were all thankful for the drier, calm weather, especially when we could watch the sunset!
 We had a conference that evening, to come up with our plans for the rest of the trip. Sam and I were to be picked up at the 0930 low-tide that Saturday, the 29th, where we flew in, at the Alder Stream landing site, about 16 km back.

No big storms were expected, but due to the roughness of the beach, and the multiple stream crossings we would have to packraft across, Sam and I decided we should leave the next afternoon, after the high tide, Thursday, and at least get past the very rough 4 km or so boulder-beach section, and camp there. So we would then have a shorter 12 km hike friday to the Alder Stream site, where we could set up a nice camp, and have a relaxed final evening before departing the next day. Carl decided to accompany us back as well, for which we were grateful. He wanted to be flown out with us, and over to Icy Bay, where he would stay for several days, to try and get some good photos of Mt. St. Elias, and all around that amazing area.

That next day, Thursday, started dry, but it began to rain off and on. We all went down to the lagoon entrance in late morning, between showers, and before the high tide, to watch the waves break over the entrance.
This is how Sitkagi "Lagoon" is forming, high tides and surf break through these rocks, and push ever more water into it. This water helps to faster melt the dirt/vegetation-covered glacier ice behind it.

We couldn't stay all day though. We had to pack up, and then get moving by 1600, just after high tide, so we'd have a little more room to walk the boulder-covered beach section, but also arrive to an area to set up camp by 1800, so we'd have a little daylight left. We quickly packed, and were on our way, after saying goodbye to Hig, Erin, Katmai, and Lituya. They also offered to take any extra food we might not need. I jumped at that chance, and was able to offload at least 2 kg. Thus, my pack was much lighter, also from the food I'd eaten the past week. So now, instead of 34.1 kg (75 lbs.), my pack was down to about 27.3 kg (60 lbs.), which made a big difference in how comfortable I was, and how deftly I could manoeuver on the boulders.

As we began packing though, around 1500, steady rain set in, a real downer. Packing everything up in that, made all our gear wet. Then, as we left at 1600, the rain continued. The surf along the beach though was very beautiful.
Although the winds were relatively light, no more than 20-40 kph, large swells in the Gulf were kicking up these 2-3 metre pounders, which were incredibly loud as they boomed into the beach. The rain continued during our two hour march across the boulder beach. It took that long to just go 4 km because hopping across those wet rocks with a heavy pack is not something to do quickly, any accidents, and help will be a long time coming.

It was quite a relief to get through those by 1800, and find a nice wooded site to set up camp. However, it was raining even harder as we unpacked. What followed was my least favourite evening of the trip, setting up camp wet and sweaty (from the exertion of the walk with the heavy pack), then eating a quick meal without the heat of the woodstove from Hig and Erin' tent, got me chilled very quickly, and I had no dry layers to change into. My sleeping bag was still mostly dry, so right after dinner, in damp layers, I crawled into my tent and bag, very dispirited. It took me some time to get to sleep, being so cold/damp. But my down bag and body heat eventually dried me out at least partially, by morning.

The next day, Friday the 28th, dawned dry with just high clouds, and the forecast we'd gotten the day before was for it to stay dry the entire day and that night. What a relief! After a nice dry breakfast, we quickly were packed and on our way by 1030. And the day just kept getting nicer. By 1300, it was entirely sunny, as were all of our moods. We approached the area where the dead sea lion had been, in early afternoon, slowly, in case of bear activity. But, the sea lion had been washed away in the big storm Tuesday. For which we were relieved, one less thing to worry about. We had two quick pack-raft crossings to do, then a nice 4 km section through the woods, where our first camp had been after our arrival. We made good time through those areas.
One interesting thing we noticed, was that a small area of higher ground which separated the beach, from the small river behind, which flowed out from the glacier, had been breached during the Tuesday storm. Another few storms like that (there are always several every fall/winter), and it will become much bigger. Eventually eroding enough that the river mouth may then shift to this area, about 1.5 km upstream from the current one. Which will then allow high tides to enter into the river that much further in, hastening erosion there, etc... You can see how dynamic the terrain here is, and how quickly things can change.

After coming out of the spruce woods, the beach was so littered with debris, and it was high tide. So we had to go through Alder thickets just inland, and cross two streams on logs, which was quite dicey with our heavy packs on. Fortunately Carl helped both Sam and I across these, first by testing them out without his pack on, then by crossing first, and assisting us.
Our last major obstacle of the day was the river crossing just 1.5 km from the Alder Stream landing site. We hit it around 1700 in the waning light of the day. It was a nice gentle current, and fun to get across. But we were eager to deflate the rafts, and head down the beach to find a good camp site. That last part of the hike was quite nice, a real, wide, sandy beach, easy walking with our heavy packs, in the evening sun. We got to the edge of the woods by 1800 and found a nice camp site, had a good dinner in dry weather, and were able to hang out together without worrying about having to stay dry. Carl always had a lightweight portable shelter he'd set up, where we would store our food, well away from camp, and eat our meals in. Then after we ate, we'd join Hig and Erin in their heated tent, to warm up/dry out, and hang out.

It began raining though, after we got in our tents for our final night. I didn't mind, knowing we'd be picked up on the beach tomorrow, and then heading back to the comforts we all take for granted. Les, from Alsek Air was scheduled to fly in at 0930 Saturday morning, at low tide, to pick us up. So we were all up by 0730 and packed by 0900 and on the beach. It was raining, though the visibility was still at least 8-10 km, and the wind 20-40 kph, so we knew Les would make it. Sure enough, exactly at 0930 he buzzed by us, landed, and taxied right up to our feet! Great flying, and great service. It was raining harder as we packed up and got into the plane. Unfortunately, Carl had to stay behind, to be picked up the next day. Les's scheduling was too tight for him to take Carl to Icy Bay. During the short 30 min. flight back to Yakutat, the rain became much heavier, and it was obviously much windier. We got out just in time.

All in all, I had an amazing and interesting time on this trip. Getting to know Hig and Erin better, learning from them about all the different kinds of treks they do, and also talking about the changes we were seeing there, around the Malaspina Glacier. It was also a great pleasure spending time with Carl, and benefitting from his vast wilderness experience, as well as with Sam, who was very eager to learn all about Alaska, in this, his first trip to the state. When Hig and Erin return from their trip next week, and then begin writing it up on their web-site, and putting on videos, I encourage you to check them out, they will be very interesting, and enlightening. For now, they have done a few blog posts, which they've had to give to their visitors, to take out with them.

I'd love to return to this area some day, during a gentler time, with longer days, such as in May or June (April/May/June are the driest months there), and explore more, and see the continuing rapid changes there. And bring Mattie, and our new A.P.R. intern, Kluane. Perhaps you'd like to join us?

Tuesday, October 18, 2011

AVENIDA REVOLUCION [y] EL PROYECTO MALASPINA


No, were not talking about the Avenida Revolucion, in Tijuana, B.C., Mexico, the world-famous introduction to Mexico visitors receive when they cross over the World's busiest border crossing from San Diego, CA. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Avenida_Revoluci%C3%B3n

An avenue that as a child, opened my eyes up to the shocking poverty and hopelessness of life in the "Third World". The state of Baja California Norte, and the city of Tijuana have taken great pains over the last 25 years or so to "clean up" and improve the image of the central core area of the city, yet you still only have to walk a few blocks off Revolucion or the other main drag, Avenida Constitucion, to understand what the "Third World" really means.

But the Avenida Revolucion we're talking about now is Wall Street. Because there is a revolution now occurring, and spreading across the World, from and because of it.

And which is very inspiring, and if it continues to grow and spread, will bring about meaningful changes toward building a more sane and just society in this and other countries. This is a revolution in spirit, and non-violent direct action, inspired by those which started in Tunisia and Egypt, not a violent overthrow of an existing regime, as say occurred in Russia in 1917, or France, in 1789. Though if the "corporatocracy" which continues, so far, in it's unabated sociopathic path of greed, and destruction of lives, hope, and the environment, across the World, is not checked, it will eventually be. Fortunately, "practising idealists", thousands and thousands of them (and hopefully soon, millions!), who realise in the core of their beings, that "ends do not justify means", are working cooperatively to bring to light and change the destructive, unjust aspects of our current predatory Capitalistic socio-political and economic system.
Corporate media sources have been criticising the movement as being filled with lazy, shiftless, unemployable "hippie" types, just coming together to party. And wondering why there have been no demands stated. Yet there are, this is a declaration issued by the main "Occupy Wall Street" working group. https://sites.google.com/site/the99percentdeclaration/ The #OWS movement started over the past year, as a loose coalition of different working groups, with no central authority and leadership, and continues to evolve that way, now with increasing support from organised labour, and a few politicians. Though great care is being taken not to allow the movement to be subverted or strangled by partisan politicians, because they know that by doing so, it's great power will be lost. None of the great changes in U.S. society since the country's inception, the end of slavery, woman's suffrage, labour reforms, civil rights, etc.., came about through the ballot box, but from direct action and civil disobedience, often at great sacrifice, and so it must be again.
Once again, one of our favourite authors, Chris Hedges, who lives in New York City, and is a part of the movement, wrote an inspiring piece about the movement, which we'd like to share part of:
                      A Movement Too Big to Fail
by Chris Hedges

"There is no danger that the protesters who have occupied squares, parks and plazas across the nation in defiance of the corporate state will be co-opted by the Democratic Party or groups like MoveOn. The faux liberal reformers, whose abject failure to stand up for the rights of the poor and the working class, have signed on to this movement because they fear becoming irrelevant. Union leaders, who pull down salaries five times that of the rank and file as they bargain away rights and benefits, know the foundations are shaking. So do Democratic politicians from Barack Obama to Nancy Pelosi. So do the array of “liberal” groups and institutions, including the press, that have worked to funnel discontented voters back into the swamp of electoral politics and mocked those who called for profound structural reform.

Resistance, real resistance, to the corporate state was displayed when a couple of thousand protesters, clutching mops and brooms, early Friday morning forced the owners of Zuccotti Park and the New York City police to back down from a proposed attempt to expel them in order to “clean” the premises. These protesters in that one glorious moment did what the traditional “liberal” establishment has steadily refused to do—fight back. And it was deeply moving to watch the corporate rats scamper back to their holes on Wall Street. It lent a whole new meaning to the phrase “too big to fail.”

photo: Daniel OliverioTinkering with the corporate state will not work. We will either be plunged into neo-feudalism and environmental catastrophe or we will wrest power from corporate hands. This radical message, one that demands a reversal of the corporate coup, is one the power elite, including the liberal class, is desperately trying to thwart. But the liberal class has no credibility left. It collaborated with corporate lobbyists to neglect the rights of tens of millions of Americans, as well as the innocents in our imperial wars. The best that liberals can do is sheepishly pretend this is what they wanted all along. Groups such as MoveOn and organized labor will find themselves without a constituency unless they at least pay lip service to the protests. The Teamsters’ arrival Friday morning to help defend the park signaled an infusion of this new radicalism into moribund unions rather than a co-opting of the protest movement by the traditional liberal establishment. The union bosses, in short, had no choice.
The Occupy Wall Street movement, like all radical movements, has obliterated the narrow political parameters. It proposes something new. It will not make concessions with corrupt systems of corporate power. It holds fast to moral imperatives regardless of the cost. It confronts authority out of a sense of responsibility. It is not interested in formal positions of power. It is not seeking office. It is not trying to get people to vote. It has no resources. It can’t carry suitcases of money to congressional offices or run millions of dollars of advertisements. All it can do is ask us to use our bodies and voices, often at personal risk, to fight back. It has no other way of defying the corporate state. This rebellion creates a real community instead of a managed or virtual one. It affirms our dignity. It permits us to become free and independent human beings.
Martin Luther King was repeatedly betrayed by liberal supporters, especially when he began to challenge economic forms of discrimination, which demanded that liberals, rather than simply white Southern racists, begin to make sacrifices. King too was a radical. He would not compromise on nonviolence, racism or justice. He understood that movements—such as the Liberty Party, which fought slavery, the suffragists, who fought for women’s rights, the labor movement and the civil rights movement—have always been the true correctives in American democracy. None of those movements achieved formal political power. But by holding fast to moral imperatives they made the powerful fear them. King knew that racial equality was impossible without economic justice and an end to militarism. And he had no intention of ceding to the demands of the liberal establishment that called on him to be calm and patience. “For years, I labored with the idea of reforming the existing institutions in the South, a little change here, a little change there,” King said shortly before he was assassinated. “Now I feel quite differently. I think you’ve got to have a reconstruction of the entire system, a revolution of values.”
King was killed in 1968 when he was in Memphis to support a strike by sanitation workers. By then he had begun to say that his dream, the one that the corporate state has frozen into a few safe clichés from his 1963 speech in Washington, had turned into a nightmare. King called at the end of his life for massive federal funds to rebuild inner cities, what he called “a radical redistribution of economic and political power,” a complete restructuring of “the architecture of American society.” He grasped that the inequities of capitalism had become the instrument by which the poor would always remain poor. “Call it democracy, or call it democratic socialism,” King said, “but there must be a better distribution of wealth within this country for all of God’s children.” On the eve of King’s murder he was preparing to organize a poor people’s march on Washington, D.C., designed to cause “major, massive dislocations,” a nonviolent demand by the poor, including the white underclass, for a system of economic equality. It would be 43 years before his vision was realized by an eclectic group of protesters who gathered before the gates of Wall Street.
The truth of America is understood only when you listen to voices in our impoverished rural enclaves, prisons and the urban slums, when you hear the words of our unemployed, those who have lost their homes or cannot pay their medical bills, our elderly and our children, especially the quarter of the nation’s children who depend on food stamps to eat, and all who are marginalized. There is more reality expressed about the American experience by the debt-burdened young men and women protesting in the parks than by all the chatter of the well-paid pundits and experts that pollutes the airwaves.

What kind of nation is it that spends far more to kill enemy combatants and Afghan and Iraqi civilians than it does to help its own citizens who live below the poverty line? What kind of nation is it that permits corporations to hold sick children hostage while their parents frantically bankrupt themselves to save their sons and daughters? What kind of nation is it that tosses its mentally ill onto urban heating grates? What kind of nation is it that abandons its unemployed while it loots its treasury on behalf of speculators? What kind of nation is it that ignores due process to torture and assassinate its own citizens? What kind of nation is it that refuses to halt the destruction of the ecosystem by the fossil fuel industry, dooming our children and our children’s children?
“America,” Langston Hughes wrote, “never was America to me.”

“The black vote mean [nothing],” the rapper Nas intones. “Who you gunna elect/ Satan or Satan? In the hood nothing is changing,/ We aint got no choices.”
Or listen to hip-hop artist Talib Kweli: “Back in the ’60s, there was a big push for black … politicians, and now we have more than we ever had before, but our communities are so much worse. A lot of people died for us to vote, I’m aware of that history, but these politicians are not in touch with people at all. Politics is not the truth to me, it’s an illusion.”...
The liberal class functions in a traditional, capitalist democracy as a safety valve. It lets off enough steam to keep the system intact. It makes piecemeal and incremental reform possible. This is what happened during the Great Depression and the New Deal. Franklin Delano Roosevelt’s greatest achievement was that he saved capitalism. Liberals in a functioning capitalist democracy are at the same time tasked with discrediting radicals, whether it is King, especially after he denounced the war in Vietnam, or later Noam Chomsky or Ralph Nader.
...The stupidity of the corporate state is that it thought it could dispense with the liberal class. It thought it could shut off that safety valve in order to loot and pillage with no impediments. Corporate power forgot that the liberal class, when it functions, gives legitimacy to the power elite. And the reduction of the liberal class to silly courtiers, who have nothing to offer but empty rhetoric, meant that the growing discontent found other mechanisms and outlets. Liberals were reduced to stick figures, part of an elaborate pantomime, as they acted in preordained roles to give legitimacy to meaningless and useless political theater. But that game is over."
Here in Anchorage, we have our own "Occupy" movement. The last two Saturday's have seen a few hundred people marching and carrying signs representing the movement around the central part of downtown, near our swank Performing Arts Centre and Museum. This past Saturday Mattie and I were able to attend and get a feel for the strength of it, and meet a few people. We arrived around 1500 in the afternoon.
The park square where the movement gathers is bounded by the two busiests streets coming in and out of Downtown Anchorage, 5th and 6th, which form the Glenn Highway, the only route north out of the city. There were people on both streets holding signs, above, and we were very heartened to hear and see nothing but support from the passing cars, honks and waves. Not a single disparaging comment. And, there were no police in evidence, either! It was a cool, drizzly day, about 4C (39F), but at least, not raining hard.
In the square between the two streets, about 150-200 people were gathered round, and some tents were set up, providing food, a library, and information about the "occupation". The plans are not to continuously occupy the square, as in NYC and other cities, but to keep returning on evenings and weekends. http://www.facebook.com/OccupyAnchorage

Non-violent civil disobedience training was offered shortly after we arrived, and we took part, as the basics were explained, which we were familiar with.
This lasted about a half-hour, then that was it for the organised events for the day. A planning meeting was set up for later in the week, for other events to follow.
We thought this young man's sign was interesting, and we checked out these links. They are worth looking into, check them out, see what you think. www.opensourceeocology.org   www.verticalfarm.com    www.windowfarms.org   That's one neat thing about when idealistic, progressive people come together, we all can learn quite a bit from each other.

We were very encouraged by the support of the passing people, both on the street, and in their cars, for the movement, and by the lack of police presence. And we look forward to reporting on Occupy Anchorage's activities, as they develop. Our climate, obviously, isn't very encouraging of outdoor protests and civil disobedience type activities, at least for half the year, all the more reason to support them in their efforts, and join in when we can. Please join us. Viva La Revolucion!

                              EL PROYECTO MALASPINA
Your lead editor will not be able to attend any of the Occupy Anchorage activities the next few Saturday's, due to our long-planned trip to the Malaspina Glacier, the largest tidewater glacier in Alaska, on the Gulf of Alaska coast near Yakutat.
Our friends at Ground Truth Trekking, http://www.groundtruthtrekking.org/About/, Hig and Erin, and their two small children, Lituya (9 months old), and Katmai (three years), are engaging in a remarkable journey, which started last 15 September, and which will end on 15 November. During which they are hiking/pack-rafting the edge of the Malaspina glacier from northwest to southeast, in about a 110 KM traverse, utilising a few pre-set caches of food and supplies. To document changes in this amazing glacial system of the last several decades, re-occupying sites, which in some cases, haven't been visited in 100 years.
Global warming is causing most of the glaciers in Alaska to rapidly recede, especially the lower-elevation source-region ones.
The Malaspina, though it's source region is in the highest elevations of the St. Elias mountains, is still receding, and in very interesting ways, which we'll be discussing when we return. And since global warming will be accelerating in the coming decades, the changes we'll show you, will be as well.

I am fortunate enough to be able to join them, for just 8 days, beginning this friday, with a couple other of their friends. We'll all be surveying the southern part of the glacier, taking photos and video. We won't be moving camp every day, probably just once or twice in the 8 days I'll be there, but doing day trips up onto the ice and around the edges and along the coast. Here are some scenes from their passage through the area in 2007:

Our intrepid assistant editor Mattie will have to remain here at the Chugach Front Research Centre unfortunately, but she will be in good hands and ready for action, when I return.

Needless to say, this is during the peak of the Gulf of Alaska fall storm season, which can offer up storms at any time with 80-160 kph winds (50-100 mph), along with heavy rain/snow. There haven't been any this strong yet, during Hig and Erin's time there, and hopefully the worst we'll see are ones half that strength. Between 1-2 day storms though, there are usually at least 1-2 nice days, where beautiful views of the wild coast, glacier, and St. Elias mountains come out. And which will enable us to work more, and move camp, when needed. This will be a good test of my best outdoor gear. Because we are right on the coast, temperatures will be fairly mild, -10C to +10C (18F to 50F), so the main issue will just be keeping dry in our tent, and outside, while we are working.

So forgive us for dropping out of contact for a few weeks. We'll be back on the 29th, and will share with you as quickly as possible, what transpired there, and our findings, in this amazing place. Cheers.

Friday, October 7, 2011

PRACTISING IDEALISTS [and] WHAT COMES NEXT...


The following excerpts are from one of the A.P.R.'s favourite "New Age" library books. The Individual and the Nature of Mass Events, by Jane Roberts.

http://www.amazon.com/Individual-Nature-Mass-Events-Seth/dp/1878424211/ref=sr_1_17?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1317966180&sr=1-17

These paragraphs, though written in 1979, are exceptionally timely now, in light of the fast-growing and spreading "Occupy Wall Street" movement, taking hold across the U.S. And which we find greatly inspiring, and hopeful, for if the movement continues to grow, real and meaningful changes could occur. Labour unions are beginning to get involved, and even a few politicians, liberal Democrats of course, like Dennis Kucinich, and Bernie Sanders, are offering encouragement.

http://www.alternet.org/story/152622/this_is_only_getting_bigger%3A_20%2C000_rally_in_new_york_to_support_occupy_wall_street/?page=entire

"...Most readers of this book can be considered idealists in one way or another by themselves or others. Yet certainly in these pages we have presented several pictures of social and political realities that are far from ideal. We have tried to outline for you many beliefs that undermine your private integrity as individuals, and contribute to the very definite troubles in the current mass world.
   Very few people really act, again, from an evil intent. Any unfortunate situations in the fields of medicine, science, or religion result not from any determined effort to sabotage the "idea", but instead happen because men often believe that any means is justified in the pursuit of the ideal.

   When science seems to betray you, in your society, it does so because its methods are unworthy of its intent-so unworthy and so out of line with science's prime purpose that the methods themselves almost amount to an insidious antiscientific attitude that goes all unrecognised. The same applies to medicine, of course, when in its worthy purpose to save life, its methods often lead to quite unworthy experimentation, so that life is destroyed for the sake of saving, say, a greater number of lives. On the surface level, such methods appear sometimes regrettable but necessary, but the deeper implications far outdo any temporary benefits, for through such methods men lose sight of life's sacredness, and begin to treat it contemptuously.

   You will often condone quite reprehensible acts if you think they were committed for the sake of a greater good. You have a tendency to look for outright evil, to think in terms of "the powers of good and evil", and I am quite sure that many of my readers are convinced of evil's force. Evil does not exist in those terms, and that is why so many seemingly idealistic people can be partners in quite reprehensible actions, while telling themselves that such acts are justified, since they are methods toward a good end.
  That is why fanatics feel justified in their actions. When you indulge in such black-and-white thinking, you treat your ideals shabbily. Each act that is not in keeping with that ideal begins to unravel the idea at its very core. As I have stated [several times], if you feel unworthy, or powerless to act, and if you are idealistic, you may begin to feel that the ideal exists so far in the future that it is necessary to take steps you might not otherwise take to achieve it. And when this happens, the ideal is always eroded. If you want to be a true practising idealist, then each step that you take along the way must be worthy of your goal.
In your country [the U.S.], the free enterprise system originated-change the word to "immersed"-is immersed in strange origins. It is based upon the democratic belief in each individual's right to pursue a worthy and equitable life. But that also [became] bound up with Darwinian ideas of survival of the fittest, and with the belief then, that each individual must seek his or her own good at the expense of others, and by the quite erroneous conception that all of the members of a given species are in competition with each other, and that each species is in further competition with each other species.

   The "laws" of supply and demand are misconceptions based upon a quite uncomplimentary belief in man's basic greedy nature. In the past you treated the land in your country as if your species, being the "fittest", had the right to survive at the expense of all other species [and cultures, eds.], and at the expense of the land itself.
The ideal of the country was and is an excellent one: the right of each individual to pursue an equitable, worthy existence, with dignity. The means, however, have helped erode that ideal, and the public interpretation of Darwin's principles was, quite unfortunately, transferred to the economic area, and to the image of man as a political animal.
   Religion and science alike denied other species any real consciousness.When man spoke of the sacredness of life-in his more expansive moods-he referred to human life alone. You are not in competition with other species, nor are you in any natural competition with yourselves. Nor is the natural world in any way the result of competitiveness among species. If that were the case you would have no world at all.

  Individually, you exist physically because of the unsurpassed cooperation that exists just biologically between your species and all others, and on deeper levels because of the cellular affiliations that exist among the cells of all species.
  ...While you believed in competition, then competition became not only a reality, but an ideal. Children are taught to compete against each other. The child naturally "competes" against himself or herself in an urge to outdo old performance with new. Competition however, has been promoted as the ideal at all levels of activity. It is as if you must look to others to see how you are doing-and when you are taught not to trust your own abilities, then of course you need the opinions of others overmuch. I am not speaking of any playful competition, obviously, but of a determined, rigorous, desperate, sometimes almost deadly competition, in which a person's value is determined according to the number of individuals he or she has shunted aside.
   This is carried through in economics, politics, medicine, the sciences, and even the religions. So I would like to reinforce the fact that life is indeed a cooperative venture, and that all the steps taken toward the ideal must of themselves be life-promoting.

...In a manner of speaking, you must be a practising idealist if you are to remain a true idealist for long. You must take small practical steps, often when you would prefer to take giant ones-but you must move in the direction of your ideals through action. Otherwise you will feel disillusioned, or powerless, or sure, again, that only drastic, highly unideal methods will ever bring about the achievement of given ideal state or situation.

   ...It is not enough to meditate, or to imagine in your mind some desired goal being accomplished, if you are afraid to act upon the very impulses to which your meditations and imaginings give rise. When you do not take any steps forward toward an ideal position, then your life does lack excitement. You become depressed. You might become an idealist in reverse, so that you find a certain excitement in contemplating the occurrence of natural disasters, such as earthquakes. You may begin to concentrate your attention on such activities. You may contemplate the end of the world instead, but in either case you are propelled by a sense of personal frustration, and perhaps by some degree of vengeance, seeing in your mind the destruction of a world that fell so far beneath your idealised expectations.

   None of the unfortunate situations discussed in this book [Jonestown suicides, Three Mile Island, eds.] have any power over you, however, if you understand that events do not by themselves. All events and situations exist first within the mind. At the deepest levels of communication no news is secret, whether or not you receive it by way of your technological gadgets.

  Your thoughts and beliefs and desires form the events that you view on television. If you want to change your world, you must first change your thoughts, expectations, and beliefs. If every reader of this book changed his or her attitudes, even though not one law was rewritten, tomorrow the world would have changed for the better. The new laws would follow.

  Any new law always follows the change in belief. It is not the other way around.

  ...There is no civilisation, no system of science, art, or philosophy, that did not originate in the mind. When you give lip service to ideas with which you do not agree, you are betraying your own ideals, harming yourself to some extent, and society as well, insofar as you are denying yourself and society the benefit of your own understanding. Each person is an idealist. I simply want to help you practise your idealism in the acts of your daily life.

   Each person alive helps paint the living picture of civilisation as at exists at any given time, in your terms. Be your own artist. Your thoughts, feelings, and expectations are like the living brush strokes with which you paint your corner of life's landscape. If you do your best in your own life, then you are indeed helping to improve the quality of all life. Your thoughts are as real as snowflakes or raindrops or clouds. They mix and merge with the thoughts of others, to form man's livingscape, providing the vast mental elements from which physical events will be formed.

   ...You are involved in a cooperative venture, in which your slightest impulse has a greater meaning, and is intimately connected with all other actions. You have the power to change your life and the world for the better, but in doing so you must, again, reevaluate what your ideals are, and the methods that are worthy of them. Science and religion have each contributed much to man's development. They must also reevaluate their ideals and methods, however.

  In larger terms, there are only scientific and religious men and women, however, and fields of science and religion would be meaningless without those individuals who believe in their positions. As those men and women enlarge their definitions of reality, the fields of science and religion must expand. You must be reckless in the pursuit of the ideal-reckless enough to insist that each step you take along the way is worthy of that ideal.

   You will understand, if you are a practising idealist, that you cannot kill in the name of peace, for if you do so your methods will automatically undermine your ideal. The sacredness of life and spirit are one and the same. You cannot condemn the body without ultimately condemning the soul. You cannot condemn the soul without ultimately condemning the body.

   I would like each of my readers to be a practising idealist, and, if you are then you will automatically be tolerant of the beliefs of others. You will not be unkind in the pursuit of your ideals. You will look upon the world with a sane compassion, with some humour, and you will look for man's basic good intent. You will find it. It has always been there. You will discover your own basic good intent, and see that it has been behind all of your actions-even in those least fitted to the pursuit of your private ideals.

  The end does not justify the means. If you learn that lesson, then your good intent will allow you to act effectively and creatively in your private experience, and in your relationships with others. Your changed beliefs will affect the mental atmosphere of your nation and of the world.

   ...There is no event upon the face of the earth in which each of you has not played some part, however minute, because of the nature of your thoughts, beliefs, and expectations.

    There is no public act in which your are not in that same manner involved. You are intimately connected with all of the historic events of your time.

   To some extent you participated in putting a man on the moon, whether or not you had any connection at all with the physical occurrence itself. Your thoughts put a man on the moon as surely as any rocket did. You can become involved now in a new exploration, one in which man's civilisations and and organisations change their course, reflecting his good intents and his ideals. You can do this by seeing to it that each step you personally take is "ideally suited" to the ends you hope to achieve. You will see to it that your methods are ideal.
  
  If you do this, your life will automatically be provided with excitement, natural zest and creativity, and those characteristics will be reflected outward into the social, politicial, economic, and scientific worlds. This is a challenge more than worth the effort. It is a challenge that I hope each reader will accept. The practising idealist...Give us a moment...When all is said and done, there is no other kind."

The "Occupy Wall Street" Movement began in earnest just a few weeks ago, with small demonstrations around Wall Street in New York City, and have quickly grown, and spread, and are meant to continue indefinitely, until, through direct action, politicians will be forced to begin acting on meaningful changes. Explicit demands of the movement are still evolving, but start with re-regulating the banking and financial industries, as they were before the repeal of the Glass-Steagall act in 1999 (by the Clinton Administration), investigation and prosecution of criminals in those "industries" who deliberately created and spread "toxic" investment programmes which nearly de-railed the global economy, investment by the federal government in massive public works/jobs programmes, to relieve the growing, crushing unemployment levels in the U.S., and very importantly, the revocation of "Corporate Personhood", by which means a coup has occurred, leaving the U.S. under a dangerous, sociopathic, corporatist government. Concerned only with corporate profits at the expense of other countries/peoples, and the environment, leading to aggressive warfare, massive unemployment/impoverishment across the globe, and accelerating environmental destruction.

One of our favourite authors, ex-New York Times reporter Chris Hedges, had this to say about the movement, in it's early stages:

The Best Among Us
by: Chris Hedges, Truthdig | Op-Ed

An activist from the Occupy Wall Street movement is shown being arrested by police in New York on September 24, 2011. (Photo: Brennan Cavanaugh / Flickr)
There are no excuses left. Either you join the revolt taking place on Wall Street and in the financial districts of other cities across the country or you stand on the wrong side of history. Either you obstruct, in the only form left to us, which is civil disobedience, the plundering by the criminal class on Wall Street and accelerated destruction of the ecosystem that sustains the human species, or become the passive enabler of a monstrous evil. Either you taste, feel and smell the intoxication of freedom and revolt or sink into the miasma of despair and apathy. Either you are a rebel or a slave.

To be declared innocent in a country where the rule of law means nothing, where we have undergone a corporate coup, where the poor and working men and women are reduced to joblessness and hunger, where war, financial speculation and internal surveillance are the only real business of the state, where even habeas corpus no longer exists [and now can be murdered by a secret panel, with no due process, as a US citizen, eds], where you, as a citizen, are nothing more than a commodity to corporate systems of power, one to be used and discarded, is to be complicit in this radical evil. To stand on the sidelines and say “I am innocent” is to bear the mark of Cain; it is to do nothing to reach out and help the weak, the oppressed and the suffering, to save the planet. To be innocent in times like these is to be a criminal. Ask Tim DeChristopher.

Choose. But choose fast. The state and corporate forces are determined to crush this. They are not going to wait for you. They are terrified this will spread. They have their long phalanxes of police on motorcycles, their rows of white paddy wagons, their foot soldiers hunting for you on the streets with pepper spray and orange plastic nets. They have their metal barricades set up on every single street leading into the New York financial district, where the mandarins in Brooks Brothers suits use your money, money they stole from you, to gamble and speculate and gorge themselves while one in four children outside those barricades depend on food stamps to eat. Speculation in the 17th century was a crime. Speculators were hanged. Today they run the state and the financial markets. They disseminate the lies that pollute our airwaves. They know, even better than you, how pervasive the corruption and theft have become, how gamed the system is against you, how corporations have cemented into place a thin oligarchic class and an obsequious cadre of politicians, judges and journalists who live in their little gated Versailles while 6 million Americans are thrown out of their homes, a number soon to rise to 10 million, where a million people a year go bankrupt because they cannot pay their medical bills and 45,000 die from lack of proper care, where real joblessness is spiraling to over 20 percent, where the citizens, including students, spend lives toiling in debt peonage, working dead-end jobs, when they have jobs, a world devoid of hope, a world of masters and serfs. 
The only word these corporations know is more. They are disemboweling every last social service program funded by the taxpayers, from education to Social Security, because they want that money themselves. Let the sick die. Let the poor go hungry. Let families be tossed in the street. Let the unemployed rot. Let children in the inner city or rural wastelands learn nothing and live in misery and fear. Let the students finish school with no jobs and no prospects of jobs. Let the prison system, the largest in the industrial world, expand to swallow up all potential dissenters. Let torture continue. Let teachers, police, firefighters, postal employees and social workers join the ranks of the unemployed. Let the roads, bridges, dams, levees, power grids, rail lines, subways, bus services, schools and libraries crumble or close. Let the rising temperatures of the planet, the freak weather patterns, the hurricanes, the droughts, the flooding, the tornadoes, the melting polar ice caps, the poisoned water systems, the polluted air increase until the species dies.

Who the hell cares? If the stocks of ExxonMobil or the coal industry or Goldman Sachs are high, life is good. Profit. Profit. Profit. That is what they chant behind those metal barricades. They have their fangs deep into your necks. If you do not shake them off very, very soon they will kill you. And they will kill the ecosystem, dooming your children and your children’s children. They are too stupid and too blind to see that they will perish with the rest of us. So either you rise up and supplant them, either you dismantle the corporate state, for a world of sanity, a world where we no longer kneel before the absurd idea that the demands of financial markets should govern human behavior, or we are frog-marched toward self-annihilation.
Those on the streets around Wall Street are the physical embodiment of hope. They know that hope has a cost, that it is not easy or comfortable, that it requires self-sacrifice and discomfort and finally faith. They sleep on concrete every night. Their clothes are soiled. They have eaten more bagels and peanut butter than they ever thought possible. They have tasted fear, been beaten, gone to jail, been blinded by pepper spray, cried, hugged each other, laughed, sung, talked too long in general assemblies, seen their chants drift upward to the office towers above them, wondered if it is worth it, if anyone cares, if they will win. But as long as they remain steadfast they point the way out of the corporate labyrinth. This is what it means to be alive. They are the best among us.
Click here to access OCCUPY TOGETHER, a hub for all of the events springing up across the country in solidarity with Occupy Wall St.

This is a hopeful time now in U.S. history, but also a dangerous one. The corporate elite who run the U.S. government are going to try every possibility to discredit and neutralise the Occupy movement. Beyond just the usual police harrassment and break-up of demonstrations, other tactics will be having undercover provocateurs trying to instigate acts of violence and/or vandalism, co-opting parts of it into larger, more "mainstream" groups, where it will slowly be strangled, or, in worst-case scenarios, a "false-flag" event of some sort, will be staged, a "terrorist" attack perhaps. Which will then, it is thought, lend more support to a real crack-down on activists. That is why it is so vitally important that everyone who is engaged in, and/or in support of the Occupy Wall Street movement always keep in mind that the means must remain worthy of the goals, i.e., using non-violent methods of non-cooperation and protest, to build a more sane and just society, and constantly articulate, feel, and visualise the kind of changes we wish to see. It has been very heartening to see lately, as well, that many of the protestors have been appealing to the NYPD, chanting sayings like "you NYPD are part of the 99% too!", and the police, some of them, have expressed solidarity. As they should, because all public employees are threatened by our current Corporate Regime.

Many in the news media have been critical of the movement for not being more specific with their demands, but as we wrote previously, there are basic ones that have been presented. To these, we here at the Alaska Progressive Review would like to add the following, and many others have suggested similarly:

1. Immediate revocation of the "Patriot Act", re-instatement of Habeus Corpus, investigation and prosecution for waging aggressive warfare, torture, and genocide, of officials from the Bush, and current Obama Administrations.

2. Immediate end to the wars and occupations of Iraq and Afghanistan, immediate cessation of the illegal and immoral drone attacks throughout the Middle East, and reparations to the countries affected.

3. Cutting the U.S. defense budget by 2/3, dismantling all of the 1000+ overseas military installations, and then involving current active duty military personnel in national and global infra-structure and disaster-relief projects (along with the newly-developed civilian programmes of a like nature).

4. Instituting fair and balanced taxation on all income tax levels, with a negative income tax at the lowest income levels to guarantee those who can't work, life (this was actually proposed in 1971 by then pres. Nixon, we kid you not!).  A 0.5% financial speculation tax on all stock and investment trades.

5. A national health care system similar to all the other industrialised nations in Europe and Canada, which would save the U.S. government hundreds of billions of dollars.

6. Aggressive promotion and investment on alternative energy research, development, and rapid implementation, before runaway global warming causes irreverisible global sea level rises from the melting of Greenland's ice sheets.

7. Ending the "Drug War", legalisation of all drugs, combined with strict management of them, and investment in treatment programmes for addicts. Countries that have done/or doing this have seen great results in decreased addiction levels and lowering of crime rates.

8. Expropriation of (at fair market value) privately-run prisons back to the public sector, ending corruption and illegal/unfair imprisonment of vast numbers of people.

9. Changing federal tax codes to favour worker-owned business, businesses that will manufacture in the U.S., with living wages/benefits, cooperatives, and credit unions.

Many more could be articulated, but these are some things that if done, could truly make this country a just, sane, and inspirational one to the rest of the World.

                                  WHAT COMES NEXT...

In case you missed it, a few days ago, the U.S. government murdered one of it's own citizens in another country, without any due process or court procedures, using a "drone" aircraft in Yemen, and in which, as with all these attacks, many innocent civilians were murdered. That means that the U.S. government, through a secret panel, answering to the president, has declared it legal to murder, not just civilians in any country, but U.S. citizens as well. Just how long do you think it will be then, if the current system is left unchecked, before progressive people/activists, will be targeted? Just as they were in Chile and throughout South and Central America in the 1970s-early 1990s.
Paul Craig Roberts, who used to be the Assistant Secretary of the Treasury, in the Reagan Administration, and who has since become a strong progressive voice, wrote a very good summation of what this means, you can read it here:

However, we here at the A.P.R., are more hopeful now, that this can be stopped, and must, if we are to still have a supposedly "democratic" country, with our Constitution as our legal bound. Paul's recommendation that young people flee the country is unduly pessimistic at this point, and impractical. Do you think Canada, with a population of 30 million, could take in 10 million U.S. refugees, much less want to? Very improbable. All the more reason the Occupy Wall Street Movement must continue to grow and spread, and why we here at the A.P.R. fully support it, all of our very survival and well-being is at stake. Cheers.