IN A TIME OF UNIVERSAL DECEIT...TELLING THE TRUTH BECOMES A REVOLUTIONARY ACT

"Capitalism is the astounding belief that the most wicked of men will do the most wicked of things for the greatest good of everyone." John Maynard Keynes

" Labor is prior to, and independent of, capital; that, in fact, capital is the fruit of labor, and could never have existed if labor had not first existed. Labor is the superior of capital and deserves much the higher consideration" Abraham Lincoln

Tuesday, March 20, 2012

FREE MARKET TRAIN - JAKARTA IS COMING?

We first saw the following article on the Counterpunch website over a month ago, and were quite moved by it. By the descriptions of how desperate and dirty life is in the city of Jakarta, Indonesia, and how much of the dire poverty and suffering there is perpetuated by that country's fascist, US/Multinational corporation-supported government.

We think everyone needs to give it a read, because this is what completely unregulated capitalism looks like, which must be maintained by force, to keep desperate people from rebelling.

http://www.counterpunch.org/2012/02/17/take-a-train-in-jakarta/

The Perfect Fascist City

Take a Train in Jakarta

by ANDRE VLTCHEK
If you take a train in Jakarta, be warned: the images that would unwind behind your windows could be too disturbing to bear for someone who is not a war correspondent or a medical doctor. It would often feel as if hundreds of thousands of the wretched of the earth decided to camp along the tracks, as if the garbage from the entire East Asia had been dumped along the rails, as if hell really materialized here on earth, instead of threatening us from some imaginary religious realm.

From the unwashed windows of the train you would see people suffering from all imaginable diseases. You would probably spot exposed wounds, faces burned by fires, terrible hernias, untreated tumors and omnipresent swollen bellies of children suffering from malnutrition. And there would also be some ailments and deformities that are simply too terrible to describe or to photograph.

Jakarta, the capital city of the country hailed by the Western mainstream media as ‘democratic’, ‘tolerant’ and ‘the largest economy in Southeast Asia’ is actually a place where majority of the population has absolutely no control over its future. At closer look it becomes evident that the city is stuck with the social indicators that are more common in the Sub-Saharan Africa than in East Asia. And the place is increasingly violent and intolerant towards religious and national minorities as well as those who are demanding social justice. It takes great discipline not to notice.
Slavoj Zizek, Slovenian philosopher, once wrote in his book The Violence:
“Here we encounter the Lacanian difference between reality and the Real: ‘reality’ is the social reality of the actual people involved in interaction and in the productive processes, while the Real is the inexorable ‘abstract’, spectral logic of capital that determines what goes on in social reality. One can experience this gap in a palpable way when one visits a country where life is obviously in shambles. We see a lot of ecological decay and human misery. However, the economist’s report that one reads afterwards informs us that the country’s economic situation is ‘financially sound’ – reality doesn’t matter, what matters is the situation of capital…”
Indonesian capital and its elites are doing well, although exactly at the price of the country being in shambles. But let’s go back to the trains.

I decided to take commuter rail, from Manggarai Station to the suburban city of Tangerang (the same place which, just a few years ago, unconstitutionally but with absolute impunity imposed sharia law on its population), for one simple reason: to see whether there was any real progress in ‘fighting’ against what many describe as the imminent collapse of Jakarta’s infrastructure, alas final gridlock.

The gridlock, like everything in Indonesia, has its colorful history:

Since 1965 (the year of the brutal US-backed military coup which brought general Suharto to power and took between 800.000 and 3 million lives. Murdered were the leftists, intellectuals, people of Chinese minority, unionists and atheists) the government worked hard to make sure that Indonesian cities would have no public transportation, no sizeable parks and no sidewalks. Public places in general were considered very dangerous, as that is where the people used to gather discussing ‘subversive’ issues like their plans for the country.

Public parks were taken away from the people by ‘developers’ whom built their private golf courses for the elites. Sidewalks had to go, too, as they were not profitable and ‘too social’. And the public transportation became private and eventually got reduced to polluting minivans and appalling second hand Indian Bajaj rickshaws that haven't run for decades even in India.

And that was in Jakarta. Other cities with 1 to 2 million inhabitants like Palembang, Surabaya, Medan and Bandung have had no public transportation whatsoever, apart from dirty and tiny minivans and dozens of dilapidated, rusty and smelly buses.

That was of course the plan: car manufacturers were regurgitating old Japanese car models selling them at inflated prices (cars in Indonesia sell for 50 to 120 percent higher prices than in the United States), forcing the people of Indonesia – some of the poorest in East Asia – to buy their own private vehicles. Cars were the first to be injected, followed by dangerous, environmentally fatal and inefficient scooters that are actually banned in all major Chinese cities and in many other Asian ones.
Government officials and People’s Representatives (DPR) have been having their palms greased by the car industry, quietly but consistently. The car lobby became extremely powerful, blocking all attempts to improve the rail and maritime travel between various ports in Java, the most overpopulated major island in the world.

On 14 August 2011, Jakarta Post reported:
Indonesian Democratic Party of Struggle member Nusyirwan Soedjono, a deputy chairman of House of Representatives’ Commission V overseeing transportation affairs, has long questioned the government’s reluctance to allocate more state funding for the improvement of the country’s railway network, blaming its submission to “high-level” political lobbying arranged by the automotive industry, which has received direct advantages from the rapid development of the country’s road infrastructure.
There has been no story of us [the Commission V] rejecting the government’s budget proposal for developing railway infrastructure,” Nusyirwan told The Jakarta Post. “But it seems like there have been certain ‘powerful groups’ which always oppose every attempt to advance the services of our mass transportation, especially trains.
As they would in any extreme fascist or feudal society, ‘elites’ have been enjoying their chauffeured limousines, while the poor have been breaking their legs when falling to the open sewers, getting raped and air-poisoned in private, dreadful and unregulated minivans or risking to have their brains spilled on uneven pavement after frustrating maneuvers on their scooters between aggressively-driven cars and trucks.

With impunity and impressive consistency, Jakarta has been stripped of almost all public spaces, while it became clear that the government was becoming increasingly unmotivated, incompetent, overfed and lazy, determined to block all long-term solutions.

Length of the rail tracks actually shrank since the Dutch colonial power; Jakarta became the only city of its size (over 10 million inhabitants, more during the weekdays) in the world without any type of mass transit system.
A few years ago there was some feeble attempt to build two lines of urban monorail, not the most efficient mass public system to begin with. Streets were blocked, dust and dirt everywhere, citizens were asked to be patient as this was ‘being built for them,’ although not really, as this was going to be pro-profit transportation system.
The project was given to a private consortium and then, predictably, the public money had been embezzled. Construction stopped without any warning, leaving ugly concrete piles sticking in the middle of the avenues. No heads were seen rolling as a result of that scandalous fraud and the press remained predictably disciplined, reporting only what was officially declared, which is always the case when too much money gets robbed by those who are ‘too important to be disturbed’ by an investigation.

To be fair, there were other attempts to save Jakarta: for instance the introduction of so-called water taxis to hopelessly polluted canals. But floating objects easily broke the engines of these primitive and unattractive open dinghies plus the stench from the surface of the canals that are permanently covered by thick and consistent layer of garbage and toxic substances was so repulsive that the ‘project’ was scrambled after only several weeks.
East Flood Canal was supposed to change everything, to revolutionize entire approach to public works and to bring development of the city to at least some basic Asian standards of the 21st century. For decades, Jakarta has been suffering from epic floods; sometimes two thirds of the city would find itself under the water, result of clogged canals, annihilated green areas and unbridled over-development. A decision was finally made to acquire the land and to dig the canal that could bring excessive water to the sea. It was promised that there would be public parks or at least some pathways along the shores. Romantics even dreamed about the bicycle lanes and promenades, and there were calls for water transport and, how daring (!) the tramlines.

Those who were still harboring some hopes for Jakarta have experienced an extremely hard landing. In 2010 and 2011, as the work on canal was still far from completion, the reality began to surface.
Construction quality was truly appalling and even before the work was near finishing stages the garbage was already covering entire length of the project. And then came the shock: the government had obviously no plan to place any public transportation on the banks of the canal. In fact it made sure (as always) to stir away from building any evil public areas. Stripes of land were recently (beginning of 2012) converted to yet another set of roads that were immediately reclaimed by polluting and noisy scooters. Not yet finished (although officially it is already operational), the entire canal looks as just too familiar hybrid of spontaneously created garbage dump and the wet dream of the scooter/car lobby.

Along all those wasted square kilometers of urban space (although officially the administration calls is a true success) there is not even a tiny path for people to walk on, not one single playground for children.

How do the officials manage to survive after such evident fiascos and after betraying and robbing their own people? After all, what the city administration allows to be happening, in what it is involved, would be considered ’treason’ in several other countries in Asia.

The answer is: in ‘democratic Indonesia’ there is no accountability. There is none; zero, zip! Corruption is endemic and the citizens have no mechanism to organize protest (obsession with the social networks like Facebook is mainly for status reasons only, as well as for empty chat: even the murder of people of different believes by hard-line religious cadres does not bring ‘educated and middle class’ people to the streets).

It feels that the entire nation, including its capital, gave up long time ago. People are living their lives in this monstrous megacity, not even bothering to demand, to protest or to complain.

Of course in Indonesia complaining leads nowhere, letters addressed to DPR go unanswered, even unopened, while letters to the press get published only if they stay in undefined but intuitively understood limits. ‘Projects’ are not open for debate (too much money is often involved and the government and private companies divide the loot among themselves in accordance with the well established rules and formulas) and would never risk allowing the system to be endangered by interference of the citizens): the people are simply informed (once in a while) about what is going to be built; when and where. If money disappears, as it does with predictable consistency, there are no repercussions. If plans ‘change’ or if schedules are not kept, nobody is held responsible.

Indonesia is a perfect dictatorship with periodically held elections (electorate can freely choose between one set of corrupt candidates with business interests and another set of corrupt candidates with business interests): a leader in the new breed of countries controlled and sponsored by Western interests with absolutely no power given to the people.

Passengers who would fall through the rusty floors of trains to their deaths or those who fall through unmarked holes that could be found all over the city get no apology, let alone compensation.

Asked to compare Indonesia and China, professor Dadang M. Maksoem, a former lecturer at UPM (University Putra Malaysia), who now works for the government of West Java, gets furious: “Very simple: they [the Chinese] are committed to do their best for their nation. There is no dedication like that here. How come, in this part of the world, governments can’t even provide decent public transportation? People are forced to buy their own motorcycles to transport themselves – forced to risk their lives, having terrible accidents. Now there are traffic gridlocks everywhere. You can say that our system is stupid, idiotic, brain-dead, or greedy. Just go on and fill the gap!”

But that’s not what one could read in the Western mainstream media. Officially the West admires Indonesia. How could it not: Indonesian rulers and its servile elites sacrificed their own people, their own islands, even their own capital city for the good and profits of Western multi-national companies and imperial geopolitical interests. Which foreign corporation or government would not appreciate such a generosity?

But once again, back to the public transportation.

Around the time when the administration and private sector were flirting with the construction of a monorail (or at least they told the people that they were), the city began to build so called ‘busways’; projects based on an absolutely misunderstood concept of public transportation project of the city of Bogota in far away Colombia, South America.

Instead of building a heavy-duty train system, Jakarta slashed off two lanes from some major thoroughfares and supplied locally and very badly made narrow busses where passengers sit along the walls facing each other. Each bus had only one door. Monstrous stations were made of metal sheets that were rusting and full of holes. Most of the automatic platform doors have broken down and many people ended up being pushed to the road and to death from serious injuries.

As with anything else in Jakarta, the system is not designed to improve the life of the ordinary citizens; in this case to ease traffic congestion and to move millions of people in safety and comfort. It is designed as a ‘project’ designed to enriching private companies that share their profits with corrupt officials.

The busway system is inefficient, aesthetically unacceptable and it is actually not helping to connect the city – it is fragmenting it further. There are hardly any sidewalks adjacent to the stations. People arriving at the stop have to risk their lives reaching their homes walking through the streets congested with traffic, or by other means of transportation.

Even if the busway stops are near the train stations, planners make sure that there could be no direct connectivity. For decades, Jakarta’s rulers made sure to disconnect all transportation structures, including Dutch-era train stations from the rest of the city. The city has almost no sidewalks, almost no underpasses (there is just one in the whole city, near ‘Kota’, that took several years to build and which already began resembling a hellhole long before the completion) linking the stations to the avenues. Not that Jakarta actually has many avenues – most of them were converted to terrible poor replicas of Houstonian suburban throughways: with elevated and surface highways, almost no walkways and services fenced and separated from one another.

The stupidity of the city planning can be only matched by the idiocy of the development of the country as a whole – Jakarta is a microcosm. To make a U-turn, one has to often drive for one kilometer or more, adding to traffic jams, fuel consumption and pollution. But the city is designed that way so that one has to often drive even in order to cross the street, as there are hardly any passable sidewalks or street crossings. Nothing is connected here and no matter what, one has to use a car or increasingly ‘popular’ cheap polluting scooter (locals call them wishfully ‘motorbikes’) and then rot in macet – the legendary traffic jam – as the car lobby managed to buy and corrupt several layers of the government, as a result forming resistance to construction of any efficient public transportation network.

There are clearly many financial interests involved. To analyze Indonesia, it is necessary to remember that ‘normal’ considerations and moral principles disappeared from the lexicon of the rulers.

Small group of business people and politicians here had already plundered most of the country’s natural resources; they destroyed rainforests and turned this vast archipelago into the environmental disaster. The majority of Indonesians never came close to sharing profits from destruction of their country.

Jakartans are no exception. The city is being developed ‘against its people’, as was noted by significant Australian artist George Burchett who had visited more than two years ago.


The population is uninformed and phlegmatic after decades of pro-business brainwashing campaigns and after the destruction of inquisitive thought in this city that at this point has no art cinemas, permanent theatres, socially oriented press or art galleries specializing in unveiling Indonesian tragedy through art.

Instead, billions of bits of social rubbish are flying from one Blackberry to another: elites are chatting and listening to outdated pop music, stuffing themselves on Western and Japanese junk food. There is not much else to do. In the meantime, the city is collapsing, covered in poisonous fumes, with enormous slums filling the space between giant but repetitive malls and office buildings. There is no water in its once glorious canals – just toxics.

The most horrifying thing is that there seems to be no space for people. People became irrelevant. Even children: no playgrounds, no parks. Even poor Port Moresby, the capital of Papua New Guinea does incomparably more for its citizens.

“To hell with your aid!” shouted President Sukarno publicly at the US ambassador, more than half a century ago. A terrible vendetta came promptly. After the US-sponsored coup and fascist regime holding the reigns of power until this very day, Jakarta was changed to a “To hell with the people!” kind of place.

“When I come to Jakarta, I don’t want to leave the house”, explains Nabila Wibowo, daughter of an Indonesian diplomat. She decided to stay in Portugal after her mother’s post ended. “There is no culture here, no concerts, no good music. And I can’t even walk or move around the city. There are no sidewalks. I just stay for some time, locked in my room, and read my books”.

Now the city is ‘threatening’ to build MRT, a subway system that is expected to have two lines upon completion. The project had been postponed for decades, but if it would finally go ahead, many analysts including some ITB (Bandung Institute of Technology) professors are terrified to even imagine what the results could be, considering the track record of the city authorities and the quality of other transportation projects all over the country.

It is most likely that the money would be allocated and then embezzled again. In Indonesia there is absolutely no mechanism to guarantee transparency and impartial supervision. That's a striking contrast to other complex countries like India where the New Delhi subway system was actually built on time and below original estimated cost.

It appears that embezzlement of public funds is the profession staffed by the most talenented people of Indonesia. This is where the city and the country hold the world prime.

There is no serious pressure from the public to stop this madness. By now the public is used to choking, dying prematurely from pollution, living in slums without clean water and basic sanitation, and sitting in endless traffic jams. The majority of the people of Jakarta never leave the country and therefore do not know that a ‘different world is possible’, that there are actually cities built for the people, not against them. Elites that travel know the reality very well, but would not tell.

The vicious cycle is omnipresent: new projects are announced, then launched, and finally scrambled after enough pockets get filled. People are left with nothing and don’t even demand anything. It had been like that, to a greater or lesser extent, during the feudal days and during the Dutch colonial administration. Although before passing away, the greatest Indonesian writer Pramoedya Ananta Toer told me “the situation was never as bad as now.”

Those who know or should know what is behind the scenes are either complicit or simply refuse to face the reality.

In February 2012 I asked Ms Ririn Soedarsono, professor at prestigious ITB, whether the MRT project has any chance to be completed.

“We will start building MRT this year”, she replied. “By the end of 2013 the first phase would be completed. Technically there should be no problem. But I don’t know what would be the political climate…”

2013? Even in technologically developed countries like Japan, China or Chile, one subway line could easily take between 4 and 10 years to construct, depending on the terrain. But maybe I misunderstood the ‘first phase’ definition.

Trains are still better in Jakarta than in Nairobi, some are even air-conditioned, as they come imported used from Japan, but they tend to deteriorate rapidly due to the lack of maintenance: one year in Jakarta and 30 year old Japanese trains that have arrived in perfect condition would end up having its doors broken, seats slashed and air-conditioning system clogged with dirt.

“We go by train twice a week”, explain Ms Enny and Ms Susie from Bogor. “It’s unbearable during the weekdays, especially peak hours. It is almost impossible to find a space to stand. It is quite scary and traumatic especially for us women, especially when passengers run in hordes, fighting to enter the car.”

Superiority of Jakarta’s trains over those in Nairobi, the capital of one of the poorest nations on earth (Kenya) and another ‘capitalist and democratic miracle’ may not last for long. By the beginning of 2013 Nairobi is poised to finish renovating its rail tracks and to put in service the first modern line, followed by the second one in 2014. The stations will come with parking lots; shops and modern facilities, connecting neighborhoods inhabited by the middle class and the poor.

Chinese construction firms that are involved in building highways, overpasses and other infrastructural projects in East Africa are also constructing sidewalks, rail tracks and within two years are planning to connect Jomo Kenyatta International Airport with the Nairobi rail network.

Collapsing Sukarno Hatta Airport at the outskirts of Jakarta has been waiting for rapid rail service for decades but so far only got extra lanes of highway.

One question that comes logically to one’s mind is: could Indonesia be so far behind the places like Cairo, Nairobi, Johannesburg and Lagos or is something else going on? Could it be possible that the Indonesian elites are actually sacrificing tens of millions of people for their own profits? They did it before: could they be doing it again?

Along the tracks, half naked dirty children and infants play in garbage and open sewers. Rubbish is burned here in open, as Jakarta doesn’t have comprehensive rubbish management system. Garbage collection and management is by definition a public service, therefore nothing that would make profits and excite the officials. Only fraction of Jakarta resident’s has access to truly clean water, only 30 percent to basic sanitation.

It is a living hell all around the train cars that are slowly making their way from one monstrous station to another.

Reading Indonesian press perfecting its art of deception and you would think that there is at least some basic rail system already in place, in need of serious improvement but in place nevertheless.

You could even find some maps of the ‘system’ on the Internet. But try to reach the station, try to use the network, and you would be forced to have many second thoughts about its existence as a dignified transportation option.

There are no schedules and no information. Unreceptive, slow and inefficient employees sell tickets manually. To get to the platform is dangerous. But despite everything, it is mainly the Indonesian middle class that rides the trains.

However, it is the middle class locally defined, using brackets of the World Bank and Indonesian government: according to them, the members of the middle class here are those who live on more than US$2.00 a day. And that applies even to this city, which is by many standards one of the most expensive in East Asia.

According to that calculus, the ‘middle class’ forms the majority of the city in Jakarta. A great part of it lives in what would be considered elsewhere as ‘slums’. Some of its members don’t have access to clean water; most of them live in inacceptable hygienic conditions.

Some members of Jakarta’s ‘middle class’ ride on the roofs of the trains because they can’t afford the train fare; several people get electrocuted each year, others fall to their death. To keep them off the roofs, the compassionate government began hanging concrete balls above the tracks to break their skulls, as well as spraying them with colors, even with excrement. Several stations including Manggarai, attached razor wires to the roofs of the platform, so the people who would try to jump from the roof would get shredded.

Herry Suheri – a cigarette seller at Manggarai Station does not think people will be deterred by all those drastic measures: “There are still people riding on the roofs of economy trains, especially during the peak hours. And it is not only about the free ride. There are simply not enough trains to accommodate people who have to get home or to work.”

The train system, the ‘green areas’, the ‘plan to improve the city’ – everything is fake, an imaginary world of deceptions. The reality is brutal but clear: Jakarta does not fall under any definition of the city. It is a laboratory, an experiment of market fundamentalism. The guinea pigs are people. They are being studied: how much discomfort could they take, how much of an unhealthy environment, and what doses of depressing vistas would make them finally run away?

For now, all hopes for Jakarta should be abandoned. ‘The most unlivable major city in Asia-Pacific’ will not improve, not anytime soon, not in the foreseeable future, not under this administration and this regime.

In South America the right-wingers used to shout: “Jakarta is Coming!” to frighten left-wing governments in Chile and elsewhere in the world. Jakarta is now here, in its full glory; a monument to unbridled capitalism; the monster, the warning, and the case study for those who want to understand how low the elites could sink in their overwhelming greed and selfishness.
All photos by Andre Vltchek.
Andre Vltchek is a novelist, filmmaker and investigative journalist. He lives and works in East Asia and Africa. His latest non-fiction book “Oceania” exposes Western neo-colonialism in Polynesia, Melanesia and Micronesia. Pluto in UK will publish his critical book on Indonesia – (Archipelago of Fear) – in August 2012. He can be reached through his website.

We realise, here at the A.P.R., that there are significant cultural and historical differences between Indonesia, and the US, which also partially help explain why the bulk of the populace in that country are locked in such dire poverty. But at the same time, in all seriousness, if current trends in the US continue, with the oligarchy/corporatocracy continuing it's concerted push to roll back labour rights, food/drug safety, environmental protection, accelerate financial deregulation, and shifting of the tax base onto the middle and lower classes, the conditions you just read about in Jakarta, will be coming to the US. In the current sociopathic crop of US republican, and most democratic party politicians, there are no plans whatsoever for any significant jobs programmes, to make up for all the offshored manufacturing, and now even white-collar jobs lost over the past 20 years to low-wage countries. Combine that with the increasing attacks on organised labour, the demonisation of public sector employees (especially in the teaching profession) and continuing efforts to privatise more and more governmental functions (which will lower wages for whatever jobs are left), and you can see the writing on the wall.

An excellent example of the sociopathic greed driving the US and now other "developed" nations toward the hell of unregulated, predatory capitalism, can be found in the "fracking" debate. In which energy companies are pushing many state governments, and the federal, to allow very destructive, polluting practices in their push to maximise profits.


The above article mentions just how hazardous, and destructive these processes are that are used to obtain natural gas from areas in which it was previously too difficult/expensive. The energy companies know that what they are doing is hazardous to the environment, resulting in groundwater contamination, and human health hazards. Which is why they wrote the following legislation in republican dominated Pennsylvania, which was signed into law by their republican governor, Tom Corbett. This heinous legislation, unprecedented really, actually can force doctors from telling their patients that the fracking process/chemicals are what is responsible for their health problems!

"The law, an amendment to Title 52 (Oil and Gas) of the Pennsylvania Consolidated Statutes, requires that companies provide to a state-maintained registry the names of chemicals and gases used in fracking. Physicians and others who work with citizen health issues may request specific information, but the company doesn’t have to provide that information if it claims it is a trade secret or proprietary information, nor does it have to reveal how the chemicals and gases used in fracking interact with natural compounds. If a company does release information about what is used, health care professionals are bound by a non-disclosure agreement that not only forbids them from warning the community of water and air pollution that may be caused by fracking, but which also forbids them from telling their own patients what the physician believes may have led to their health problems. A strict interpretation of the law would also forbid general practitioners and family practice physicians who sign the non-disclosure agreement and learn the contents of the “trade secrets” from notifying a specialist about the chemicals or compounds, thus delaying medical treatment.

The clauses are buried on pages 98 and 99 of the 174-page bill, which was initiated and passed by the Republican-controlled General Assembly and signed into law in February by Republican Gov. Tom Corbett.

“I have never seen anything like this in my 37 years of practice,” says Dr. Helen Podgainy, a pediatrician from Coraopolis, Pa. She says it’s common for physicians, epidemiologists, and others in the health care field to discuss and consult with each other about the possible problems that can affect various populations. Her first priority, she says, “is to diagnose and treat, and to be proactive in preventing harm to others.” The new law, she says, not only “hinders preventative measures for our patients, it slows the treatment process by gagging free discussion.”

Not only is fracking destructive to groundwater systems and overall ecosystem and human health, new research is now estimating that 8-10 % of whatever amount of natural gas is liberated from the underground rock strata escapes through cracks in the ground, and leaks in piping, into the atmosphere. Methane, CH4, is 25 times more powerful a greenhouse gas than CO2. Thus the fracking process used to liberate/produce more natural gas (methane), will now be just as bad, or worse, for global warming, than the use of coal for energy generation!  Cheers.

Saturday, March 3, 2012

SEEING THE FOREST

THROUGH THE TREES?
Vast areas throughout western North America are experiencing large areas of various species mortality in coniferous forests. Due to drought-stress/bug kills, all caused by the warming climate. It's been shocking and very sad for your lead author to visit some areas I haven't been in for 10 or more years, when I lived in Montana and worked more throughout the western lower 48 on wildfires, seeing the drastic changes. In southern Utah, east of Cedar City, vast stands of lodgepole pine above 2750 metres elevation (9000 ft) are completely dead, and so far, no new growth has taken their place. Around Stanley, Idaho at 2000 metres elevation (6600 ft.), 1/3 to 1/2 of all the standing timber of the cooler species, subalpine fir, englemann spruce, and lodgepole pine, are also dead. I also observed this near Polebridge, Montana which is on the western edge of Glacier National Park, at elevations of 1000-1830 metres (3300-6000 ft). In addition, huge expanses of the higher-elevation stands of lodgepole pine in central and southern British Columbia have died off over the past 25 years and are standing dead timber/snags now. Further north, into the Yukon, and Kenai Peninsula of Alaska, large expanses of white spruce have also died off and are standing dead, waiting for our increasingly large wildfire seasons to bring them down.
This is because the warming climate has reduced mountain snowpacks overall, hastened their melting in spring, and brought drier summers. Causing drought stress, lowering the ability of many species of trees to resist diseases and fight off bug infestations. In addition, warmer winter temperatures overall, allow more bark-beetles and spruce budworms to survive each season, leading to greater numbers of them, and in longer warm seasons, to even have two breeding/infestation cycles in the trees. All this has taken it's toll, and given that the magnitude of warming will be greatly increasing in the coming decades, we "ain't seen nothin' yet", unfortunately.
In generally ever-moist Southeast Alaska though, it's not drought and bug-kill causing significant tree die-offs in a beautiful and important species, Alaska Yellow-Cedar (which also occurs in large areas on the western slopes of the Cascades of OR/WA and coast ranges of BC), but dwindling winter snowpacks, leading to increasing frost-penetration of the ground when cold spells occur. Give this interesting article a read, we learned quite a bit.
http://www.redorbit.com/news/science/1112467261/yellow-cedar-are-dying-in-alaska-scientists-now-know-why/
 Yellow-cedar Are Dying In Alaska: Scientists Now Know Why
February 2, 2012
Yellow-cedar, a culturally and economically valuable tree in southeastern Alaska and adjacent parts of British Columbia, has been dying off across large expanses of these areas for the past 100 years. But no one could say why—until now.

“The cause of tree death, called yellow-cedar decline, is now known to be a form of root freezing that occurs during cold weather in late winter and early spring, but only when snow is not present on the ground,” explains Pacific Northwest Research Station scientist Paul Hennon, co-lead of a synthesis paper recently published in the February issue of the journal BioScience. “When present, snow protects the fine, shallow roots from extreme soil temperatures. The shallow rooting of yellow-cedar, early spring growth, and its unique vulnerability to freezing injury also contribute to this problem.”

Yellow-cedar decline affects about 60 to 70 percent of trees in forests covering 600,000 acres in Alaska and British Columbia. The paper, “Shifting Climate, Altered Niche, and a Dynamic Conservation Strategy for Yellow-Cedar in the North Pacific Coastal Rainforest,” summarizes 30 years of research and offers a framework for a conservation strategy for yellow-cedar in Alaska.
Some key findings include:

- The complex cause of yellow-cedar decline is related to reduced snow, site and stand characteristics, shallow rooting, and the unique vulnerability of the roots to freezing in low temperatures.
- Low snow levels and poor soil drainage lead to impact root injury and the eventual death of yellow-cedar trees. The tree thrives in wet soils, but its tendency to produce shallow roots to access nitrogen on these sites made it more vulnerable when spring snow levels were reduced by climate warming.
- Yellow-cedar health depends on changing snow patterns, thus locations for appropriate conservation and management activities need to follow the shifting snow patterns on the landscape.
- Some responses to shifting climate are expected to be complex and difficult to anticipate. Long-term multidisciplinary research was needed to determine the true role of climate in the health of yellow-cedar and untangle it from other processes and natural cycles in forests.

The yellow-cedar is a slow-growing tree; many are 700 to 1,200 years old. The tree has long been culturally significant to Native Alaskans who use it to make paddles, masks, dishes, and woven items. The wood is also very valuable commercially (for home and boat building) because of its straight grain, durability, and resistance to insects.

Attention is now directed toward a solution to protect and manage yellow-cedar, as coastal Alaska is expected to experience less snow but a persistence of periodic cold weather events in the future.
Scientists are working with partners in the Alaska Region of the Forest Service to use this new information as the framework for a comprehensive conservation strategy for yellow-cedar in Alaska in the context of a changing climate.

“We also have ongoing projects with colleagues in the Tongass National Forest in Alaska on planting and thinning to favor yellow-cedar on suitable habitat,” adds co-lead author and station scientist Dave D’Amore “especially on well-drained productive soils where most of the commercial forestry exits. Silvicultural techniques can be used to nudge the ecological niche of yellow-cedar, making it more competitive on these favorable sites.”

Other coauthors of the synthesis are Paul Schaberg, U.S. Forest Service, Northern Research Station; Dustin Wittwer, U.S. Forest Service, Alaska Region; and Colin Shanley, The Nature Conservancy.

Image Caption: Yellow-cedar in West Chichagof-Yakobi Wilderness Area, a pristine area of coastal Alaska, faces intensive mortality. Photo: Paul Hennon
Source: USDA Forest Service - Pacific Northwest Research Station
Winter snowpacks are dwindling at the lower elevations in Southeast Alaska because there are more frequent, persistent, and stronger high pressure ridging episodes throughout the year, but especially in winter, which move masses of warm air northward from the sub-tropics and mid-latitudes. Which we've described in several previous articles.

With the magnitude of warming expected to triple or quadruple over the next 40 years in Alaska, from that seen over the last 40, due to our increasing CO2 and Methane emissions, we therefore expect these patterns to become even stronger and more persistent. Thus, Yellow-Cedar forests will continue to die off at the lower elevations in Southeast Alaska. And for those of us living in South-Central Alaska, it means stronger and more frequent windstorms will occur throughout the year, with strong, damaging winds and dangerous turbulence for aviation. These will occur more often especially in the fall/winter/spring, along with more freezing rain episodes in winter.
We came across another article lately describing the increasing trends in wildfires expected, as climate warming continues apace. We thought it very worthwhile and worthy of sharing, and have some things to add to it. We've already written several articles here at the A.P.R., presenting our views of this important topic, of which our favourite is this:

Nevertheless, it's always refreshing when we come across research which reinforces our findings, and in this case, we have some real, first-hand experience to discuss. Give this a read, and then we'll provide some commentary.
http://www.commondreams.org/headline/2012/02/27-2
There Will Be Fire: The 'Carbon Bomb' 'Waiting to Be Ignited'

Scientist: With climate change fires will become more frequent, more intense and harder to stop.

“We are going to see more fire in (the) future, that’s the bottom line.” “A warmer world’s going to see more fire.”

photo: John McColgan of the Alaskan Type I Incident Management Team (Bureau of Land Management, Alaska Fire Service)This eery warning comes from Mike Flannigan, a senior research scientist with Natural Resources Canada and professor at the University of Alberta, at the annual meeting of the American Association for the Advancement of Science. He says that fires will become more frequent, more intense and harder to stop.
Flannigan's "conservative estimate" states there would be two to three times more fire activity in the northern hemisphere by the end of the century.
“If a fire is intense, aerial suppression is no longer effective, so even modern fire management agencies, like Canada, the United States and Australia — among the best in the world — will be extremely challenged,” he said.
“I would argue that the standard way of doing fire management will no longer be effective in the future. And that doesn’t even begin to address many parts of the globe where they have traditional fire-suppression approaches, which will be completely overwhelmed."

“So the risk to life and infrastructure is only going to increase under climate change.”

Flannigan added that peat fires are also expected to dramatically raise greenhouse gas emissions, Postmedia News reports:

If more wildfires were not bad enough, Flannigan said the warming climate means peat lands, which contain vast stores of carbon, are also more likely to ignite and release greenhouse gas emissions. The emissions could in turn “feed” more warming and more fire.
A 1997 fire in Indonesia ignited peat lands that smouldered for months. By the time it was over, Flannigan said the peat fire had released greenhouse gases equal to 20 to 40 per cent of the total worldwide emissions that year from fossil fuels.

Peat fires in the boreal could have the potential to release far more greenhouse gases. “Our peat reserves in Canada, Russia and Alaska dwarf anything in Indonesia,” he said in an interview.
Inter Press Service reports that one researcher referred to the northern forest as a “carbon bomb” "waiting to be ignited:"
When the increased fire from global warming was first detected in 2006, Johann Goldammer of the Global Fire Monitoring Center at Germany’s Freiburg University called the northern forest a “carbon bomb”.
“It’s sitting there waiting to be ignited, and there is already ignition going on,” Goldammer said according to media reports in 2006.
Inter Press Service continues:

About half the world’s soil carbon is locked in northern permafrost and peatland soils, said Merritt Turetsky, an ecologist at Canada’s University of Guelph. This carbon has been accumulating for thousands of years, but fires can release much of this into the atmosphere rapidly, Turetsky said in a release.
Over the past 10 years, fires are burning far more boreal forest than ever before. Longer snow-free seasons, melting permafrost and rising temperatures are large-scale changes underway in the north, Turetsky and colleagues have found.

Other researchers have shown that the average size of forest fires in the boreal zone of western Canada has tripled since the 1980s. Much of Canada’s vast forest region is approaching a tipping point, warned researchers at the Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research, Germany’s largest research organisation.

This “drastic change” in normal fire pattern has occurred with a only a small increase in temperatures relative to future temperatures, the German researchers concluded in a study published in the December 2011

We think this last paragraph is the most important. Which is to say, the warming that has already occurred due to our releases of CO2 and Methane over the last 40 years will be 3-4 times greater over the next 4-6 decades, since there isn't, and will not likely be any, concerted global effort to reign emissions in within the next 10 to 20 years (hopefully not any longer than that!).

Your lead author found the preceding article very interesting as well, because I was a witness to the actual site and time that the photo in it was taken. This famous picture of elk seeking refuge in the West Fork of the Bitterroot River whilst fire burns on the slopes behind occurred on the Valley Complex wildfire, near Darby, Montana, in the summer of 2000. I served as an "Incident Meteorologist" from 8/06 to 8/20 that year on that fire, which eventually burned nearly 121,500 hectares (300,000 acres), providing forecasting support for the suppression team. In fact, the very day (and moment) I arrived at the Valley Complex incident base,  the fire "blew up", and 29,600 hectares (73,000 acres) burned in 4 hours, which turned out to be the fourth biggest ever "blow up" fire in the Northern Rockies history.
This happened because the fire moved into a large area of dead and downed trees from bug-kills and wind damage, and took off. The sound of the 60 kph inflow winds feeding the monstrous plume, which we could not see the top of from our vantage a few km away (and which we later estimated reached at least 20 km height), sounded like the roar of a freight train as it whipped through camp and into the fire. Truly frightening. This plume spread smoke into the upper troposphere and lower stratosphere, and tracked across the entirety of North America, and out into the Atlantic.
My fourteen days of duty there, working 15-18 hours daily, with poor sleep due to the often thick smoke and noisy, chaotic conditions, left me sick for a month afterward, with a low-grade, nagging bronchitis. The smoke accumulations in the valleys of the region, during this wildfire were often extremely hazardous to health. Visibilities were sometimes as limited to as little as 100-200 metres, and every inhalation felt like a cigarette draw. At one point, after a few exceptionally bad days, I nearly had a panic attack at night, feeling as though I were suffocating or drowning. What calmed me was realising that the other 3000 people working there, and the several thousand residents in the nearby area, were also undergoing the same thing.

I also first noticed something new in the daily weather, that summer of 2000. Which were very low relative humidity minimums by day and recoveries at night on the mid-slopes, which are warmer and drier at night due to drainage flows. They were only recovering to 20%, or even a little less, on many nights after being in the singled digits during the day. I had never seen air-masses that dry in Montana before, when I lived and worked there from 1990-94. So all the dead fuels on the forest floors, and live fuels, were exceedingly dry, and in the right conditions, led to firestorm severity where running crown fires consumed everything, and even fused the soil to hard, glassy surfaces in some areas. Which became very dangerous for flash flooding later. It was at this time I actually realised the climate was changing, and mentioned this to one of the Fire Behaviour Analysts I was working with, who was in agreement. With high pressure ridging episodes becoming stronger overall, as climate warming continues, the subsident, or sinking air in them, has become drier, and this was the first year I realised this.
This satellite image from one of those days, 14 August, 2000, shows smoke filling all the valleys in Central Idaho and Western Montana. The Valley Complex was under the very large area of smoke covering the Bitterroot Valley. These conditions, where visibilities in trapped smoke can at times be only a 100 or 200 metres, are exceedingly hazardous. Medical research has established that the finest particulates in heavy smoke, 2.5 micrometers or less in size, and which are the most prevalent, become lodged in the bronchial tubes of the lungs for quite some time, as long as many months. During this time, the heart has to work harder, to pump more oxygen, since the lungs are rendered less efficient, like a dirty air filter. Thus, those with pre-existing respiratory and/or cardiac conditions have an enhanced risk of serious complications. Likewise infants under the age of two, whose lungs are still newly developing, are more sensitive than average, healthy adults.

During my 14 day stretch, there were about 8 of these exceptionally unhealthy days, where the thick smoke from the Valley Complex, and others in the area, was trapped by the diurnal cooling/inversions in the large valleys. Everyone working there, and living there was under great strain. I mention this, because these kind of conditions will be occurring more frequently in fire/smoke-prone areas, in the coming decades. Eastern Washington/Eastern Oregon, Idaho/Western Montana, Southern Oregon/all of California, and the higher elevations of the four-corners states have already been seeing more of this over the past 15 years, with the magnitude of warming that has occurred. Interior Alaska and the Yukon are also highly susceptible to this unfortunate pattern.

 In large fire years there over the past decade, such as 2002, 2004-5, and 2009, heavy smoke accumulations plagued the most heavily-populated areas like the Tanana Valley (above, 2004-Fairbanks and environs) and Upper Yukon drainage (Whitehorse area) for days to weeks at a time from June through August.
As our plot of Fairbanks summer average temperatures (representing the Alaska Interior) versus annual wildfire acreages show, there is a high correlation between the two, and both show increasing trends. I haven't plotted 2011, it was very low, 117,450 hectares (292,000 acres), much less than the seasonal mean of 368,550 hectares (910,000 acres). What will 2012 bring? Cheers.

Monday, February 20, 2012

ACID TEST

Even without the threat that global warming/climate change that is amplifying as emissions of CO2 and Methane increase every year from fossil-fuel combustion, the changes in seawater chemistry that the addition of the higher CO2 inputs is causing is just as great. And needs to be publicised more, so people understand just how important and grave a threat ocean acidification poses to planetary well-being and future generations quality of life. As usual, with most global warming and significant environmental issues, the US corporate media gives them very little attention, if not in many cases, providing deliberately false and understated information. We thought this article from the BBC was very interesting and enlightening.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-17088154

'Jacuzzi vents' model CO2 future

Vent site At these volcanic vent sites, carbon dioxide bubbles up like a Jacuzzi

A UK scientist studying volcanic vents in the ocean says they hold a grave warning for future marine ecosystems.

These vents have naturally acidified waters that hint at how our seas might change if atmospheric carbon dioxide levels continue to rise. They are conditions that would make it harder for corals and similar organisms to make the hard parts in their bodies.

Dr Jason Hall-Spencer's work suggests our oceans could lose perhaps 30% of their biodiversity this century.

The Plymouth University researcher has been presenting his latest findings to a major conference in Vancouver, Canada.

"I am investigating underwater volcanoes where carbon dioxide bubbles up like a Jacuzzi, acidifying large areas of the seabed, and we can see at these vents which types of organisms are able to thrive and which ones are most vulnerable," he told the annual meeting of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS).

Dr Hall-Spencer treats the vents like a time machine. As he swims towards them, the pH level of the water falls and he can use particular locations to simulate what the open ocean will be like in the decades ahead if emissions of atmospheric CO2 go unchecked and much of the that gas is absorbed into the sea [which is certain unless people world-wide can stop the corporate juggernaut bent on destroying the planet for short-term profit, eds.].

"What we see as you swim along a gradient of carbon dioxide, up to levels we expect for the end of this century, is diversity loss.

"As you go along that gradient, species drop out of the system," he told BBC News.

"It's not all calcified species - ones with hard shells or skeletons - which drop out; there are other organisms with soft bodies which drop out as well.

"This CO2 is a stressor. Some organisms can adapt but there're only a few species that can handle it. If I extend the gradient up to the year 2100 - that represents a 30% loss in biodiversity."

ACIDIFYING OCEANS

  • The oceans are thought to have absorbed up to half of the extra CO2 put into the atmosphere in the industrial age
  • This has lowered their pH by 0.1
  • pH is the measure of acidity and alkalinity
  • It ranges from pH 0 (very acidic) to pH 14 (very alkaline); 7 is neutral
  • Seawater is mildly alkaline with a "natural" pH of about 8.2
  • The IPCC forecasts that ocean pH will fall by "between 0.14 and 0.35 units over the 21st Century, adding to the present decrease of 0.1 units since pre-industrial times"

At the end of last year, Dr Hall-Spencer published his findings on one volcanic vent site off Ischia Island near Vesuvius. But at this meeting, he reported soon-to-be-published data gathered at other volcanic vents in Europe, Baja California and Papua New Guinea. They all show the same outcomes as at Ischia.

"What's strange is that we see some organisms really up-regulate their physiology to try to cope with conditions - they grow faster. But it's like us panting for oxygen at high altitude - they're struggling.

"And in the summer, when temperatures are high, these organisms that are struggling just die. And that's very problematic because of course carbon dioxide not only acidifies seawater, but it is increasing the temperature of the atmosphere [and the seawater, eds]. And those two things combined are a double whammy."
Hexaplex trunculus Shells, like this Hexaplex trunculus, dissolve at CO2 levels predicted for later this century

The world's oceans have already absorbed a third to a half of the CO2 produced by humans, principally by the burning of fossil fuels, over the past 200 years.

This has resulted in a reduction of the pH of seawater by 0.1 units on the 14-point scale. If emissions of CO2 continue to rise as forecast, there could be another drop in pH up to perhaps 0.4 units by 2100.

These are changes that are occurring far too fast for the oceans to correct naturally, said Dr Richard Feely with the US National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (Noaa)

"Fifty-five million years ago when we had an event like this (and that took over 10,000 years to occur), it took the oceans over 125,000 years to recover, just to get the chemistry back to normal," he told BBC News.

"It took two to 10 million years for the organisms to re-evolve, to get back into a normal situation.

"So what we do over the next 100 years or 200 years can have implications for ocean ecosystems from tens of thousands to millions of years. That's the implication of what we're doing to the oceans right now."

Jonathan.Amos-INTERNET@bbc.co.uk

Unfortunately for the higher latitudes seas and oceans in the Arctic, like the Bering, Beaufort, Chukchi, etc.., ocean acidification will be even more of a problem, and sooner than in the tropics and mid-latitudes because "... Polar seas are considered particularly vulnerable to ocean acidification because the high solubility of CO2 in cold waters results in naturally low carbonate saturation states. CO2 induced acidification will easily render these waters sub-saturated, where seawater becomes corrosive for calcareous organisms. By the time atmospheric CO2 exceeds 490 parts per million (2040 to 2050, depending on the scenario considered), more than half of the Arctic Ocean is projected to be corrosive to aragonite. Arctic waters are home to a wide range of calcifying organisms, both in benthic and pelagic habitats, including shell fish, seas urchins, coralline algae, and calcareous plankton. Many of these are key species providing crucial links in the Arctic food web, such as the planktonic pteropods, which serve as food for fishes, seabirds and whales."
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2010/06/100603092018.htm

If the base of the marine food chain in the Arctic, and eventually waters further south, collapses, so too will populations of the larger species in the food webs in these areas. Collapses in marine food webs would have great ramifications for land-based ones, as well as decreasing the CO2 uptake by small marine creatures such as phytoplankton, allowing even more CO2 to build up in the atmosphere/oceans, leading to more warming, etc... Another positive feedback mechanism.

But because the global (not just US and western European) financial and industrial corporate sectors are only interested in perpetual growth and short-term profit, these changes are going to occur. Scientists across the globe understand what the threats are, and are even beginning to speak in more holistic terms about the changes that are needed in socio-political-economic systems, as this article well illustrates.
http://www.commondreams.org/headline/2012/02/20-5

'Perpetual Growth Myth' Leading World to Meltdown: Experts

UN-Sponsored Papers Predict Sustained Ecological and Social Meltdown

- Common Dreams staff

"The current system is broken," says Bob Watson, the UK’s chief scientific advisor on environmental issues and a winner of the prestigious Blue Planet prize in 2010. "It is driving humanity to a future that is 3-5°C warmer than our species has ever known, and is eliminating the ecology that we depend on for our health, wealth and senses of self."
Smoke billows from burned trees. A collective of scientists and development thinkers have warned that civilisation faces an 'unprecedented emergency'. (Photograph: CRISTINA QUICKLER/AFP/Getty Images)

"We cannot assume that technological fixes will come fast enough. Instead we need human solutions. The good news is that they exist but decision makers must be bold and forward thinking to seize them."


Watson's comments accompanied a new paper released today by 20 past winners of the Blue Planet Prize - often called the Nobel Prize for the environment, and comes ahead of the 20th anniversary of the Rio+20 conference – which takes place in June this year – where world leaders will (it is hoped) seize the opportunity to set human development on a new, more sustainable path.

Civilization Faces 'Perfect Storm of Ecological and Social Problems'
The Guardian's John Vidal reports:

 In the face of an "absolutely unprecedented emergency", say the [...] past winners of the Blue Planet prize – the unofficial Nobel for the environment – society has "no choice but to take dramatic action to avert a collapse of civilization. Either we will change our ways and build an entirely new kind of global society, or they will be changed for us".
The stark assessment of the current global outlook by the group, who include [Watson]... US climate scientist James Hansen, Prof José Goldemberg, Brazil's secretary of environment during the Rio Earth summit in 1992, and Stanford University Prof Paul Ehrlich. [...]
"The perpetual growth myth ... promotes the impossible idea that indiscriminate economic growth is the cure for all the world's problems, while it is actually the disease that is at the root cause of our unsustainable global practices"

Apart from dire warnings about biodiversity loss and climate change, the group challenges governments to think differently about economic "progress".
"The rapidly deteriorating biophysical situation is more than bad enough, but it is barely recognized by a global society infected by the irrational belief that physical economies can grow forever and disregarding the facts that the rich in developed and developing countries get richer and the poor are left behind."
The group warns against over-reliance on markets but instead urges politicians to listen and learn from how poor communities all over the world see the problems of energy, water, food and livelihoods as interdependent and integrated as part of a living ecosystem. 
The paper urges governments to:
  • Replace GDP as a measure of wealth with metrics for natural, built, human and social capital - and how they intersect.
  • Eliminate subsidies in sectors such as energy, transport and agriculture that create environmental and social costs, which currently go unpaid.
  • Tackle over-consumption, and address population pressure by empowering women, improving education and making contraception accessible to all.
  • Transform decision making processes to empower marginalized groups, and integrate economic, social and environmental policies instead of having them compete.
  • Conserve and value biodiversity and ecosystem services, and create markets for them that can form the basis of green economies.
  • Invest in knowledge - both in creating and in sharing it - through research and training that will enable governments, business, and society at large to understand and move towards a sustainable future.
“Sustainable development is not a pipe dream,” says Dr Camilla Toulmin, director of the International Institute for Environment and Development. “It is the destination the world’s accumulated knowledge points us towards, the fair future that will enable us to live with security, peace and opportunities for all. To get there we must transform the ways we manage, share and interact with the environment, and acknowledge that humanity is part of nature not apart from it.”

Achim Steiner, UN Under-Secretary General and UNEP Executive Director, said: “The paper by the Blue Planet laureates will challenge governments and society as a whole to act to limit human-induced climate change, the loss of biodiversity and the degradation of ecosystem services in order to ensure food, water energy and human security. I would like to thank Professor Watson and colleagues for eloquently articulating their vision on how key development challenges can be addressed, emphasizing solutions; the policies, technologies and behavior changes required to grow green economies, generate jobs and lift people out of poverty without pushing the world through planetary boundaries.”
***
A second UNEP report was also released today in Kenya. Though separate from the assessment of the Planet Blue laureates, it echoes many of their themes and concerns.

Capital FM News in Kenya reports:

A new report by the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) has warned of a continued deterioration in the state of the global environment due to failure by governments to implement internationally agreed goals.

The summary report released at the sidelines of a UNEP Governing Council meeting in Nairobi stated that out of the 90 internationally agreed goals, only 40 were in progress, 32 had insufficient progress while 13 were not in development at all.

“We have failed to meet agreed goals,” Peter Gilruth Director Division of Early Warning Assessment (DEWA) UNEP said.

“The internationally agreed goal of avoiding the adverse effects of climate change is presenting the global community with one of its most serious challenges that is threatening overall development goals,” he noted.

He added that the rate at which forest loss, particularly in the tropics was taking place remained alarmingly high.

“Today, 80 percent of the world’s population live in areas with high levels of threat to water security, affecting 3.4 billion people mostly in developing countries,” he stated.

The Fifth Global Environment Outlook (GEO 5) assessed progress and gaps in the implementation of internationally agreed goals on environment and the full report would be released in June ahead of the Rio+20 Summit on sustainable development.

The report recommended that policy makers focus on the underlying drivers of environmental change such as the negative aspects of population growth, consumption and production, urbanisation rather than just concentrating on reducing environmental pressures or symptoms.
Unfortunately, in the US and now even in western Europe, the "Corporatocracy" continues to accelerate it's drive to push back socio-political and economic systems/models to that not seen since around 1900, erasing the gains of the labour, environmental, and even women's rights movements in pursuit of short-term profits. When completely unregulated capitalism kept average working people living in misery, toiling 60-80 hours a week for abysmal pay in unsafe conditions (which of course is how most modern conveniences are still made in "third World" countries today), whilst creating terrible pollution and unsafe food/water and drugs. But in 1900, the global population was only 1.6 billion, and now it is 7 billion, and may be 9-10 billion by 2050! We don't think it takes rocket scientists to understand how serious a situation humanity faces in the decades ahead, unless we are able to change our societies to ones that are not focused on corporate profit, but on meeting the needs of people, and protecting/sustaining the environment. For us here at the Alaska Progressive Review, that means supporting/voting for Green, or other alternative party politicians, at all levels. Supporting the Occupy and other movements working for positive changes as well, as they continue to highlight the problems we are facing. We'll also be focusing our attention and research to write about new developments in alternative energy and environmental science issues. Cheers.